| Autor: |
Claudia, Kesch, Vlad, Pantea, Timo, Soeterik, Alessandro, Marquis, Giulia, la Bombarda, Allesandro, Morlacco, Francesco, Barletta, Jan Philipp, Radtke, Christopher, Darr, Felix, Preisser, Fabio, Zattoni, Giancarlo, Marra, Roderik C N, van den Bergh, Boris, Hadaschik, Giorgio, Gandaglia |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
World journal of urology. |
| ISSN: |
1433-8726 |
| Popis: |
Purpose Although active surveillance (AS) is recommended for low- to favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy (RP) is not negligible. Available studies based on systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy might not be applicable to contemporary cohorts diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). The aim of the present study is to explore rates and risk factors for adverse outcomes (AO) at RP in patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa detected at TB with concomitant systematic biopsy (SB). Methods Multicenter, retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa at MRI-TB + SB is treated with RP. AO were defined as ISUP upgrading, adverse pathology (upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and/or ≥ pT3 at RP, and/or pN1) (AP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men with follow-up (n = 327). Results The rate of ISUP upgrading, upgrading ≥ 3, and AP were 39%, 21%, and 43%. Compared to ISUP2, men with ISUP1 PCa had a higher rate of overall upgrading (27 vs. 67%, p p p = 0.02) or SB (p = 0.01) alone. PSA, PSA density, PI-RADS, ISUP at TB, overall biopsy ISUP and EAU classification were predictors of upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and AP. The 1 year BCR-free survival was 94% with no differences in BCR rates between subgroups. Conclusion Upgrading in ISUP ≤ 2 PCa remains prevalent even in men diagnosed in the MRI era. The use of MRI-TB with concomitant SB allows for the accurate identification of ISUP2 PCa and predicts the risk of AO at RP. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink