Home-based and remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a rapid review
Autor: | Anthony K. May, Anne E Holland, Janet Bondarenko, Aroub Lahham, Mariana Hoffman, Carla Malaguti, Marnie Graco, Leona M. Dowman, Joanna Y T Lee, Gabriella Tikellis, Narelle S Cox, Angela T Burge |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: | |
DOI: | 10.1101/2020.07.15.20154930 |
Popis: | ObjectivesTo identify exercise tests that are suitable for home-based or remote administration in people with chronic lung disease.MethodsRapid review of studies that reported home-based or remote administration of an exercise test in people with chronic lung disease, and studies reporting their clinimetric properties.Results84 studies were included. Tests used at home were the 6-minute walk test (6MWT, 2 studies), sit-to-stand tests (STS, 5 studies), Timed Up and Go (TUG, 4 studies) and step tests (2 studies). Exercise tests administered remotely were the 6MWT (2 studies) and step test (1 study). Compared to centre-based testing the 6MWT distance was similar when performed outdoors but shorter when performed at home (2 studies). The STS, TUG and step tests were feasible, reliable (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.80), valid (concurrent and known groups validity) and moderately responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation (medium effect sizes). These tests elicited less desaturation than the 6MWT, and validated methods to prescribe exercise were not reported.DiscussionThe STS, step and TUG tests can be performed at home, but do not accurately document desaturation with walking or allow exercise prescription. Patients at risk of desaturation should be prioritised for centre-based exercise testing when this is available. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
načítá se...