Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
| Autor: | Sine Mette Øgendahl Buus, Marie Louise Schmitz, Pia Cordsen, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Grethe Andersen, Claus Ziegler Simonsen |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Advanced and Specialized Nursing
socioeconomic factors healthcare disparities Stroke/epidemiology Brain Ischemia reperfusion Stroke Cohort Studies Brain Ischemia/surgery Treatment Outcome Social Class thrombectomy Reperfusion employment ischemic stroke Humans Neurology (clinical) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Ischemic Stroke Thrombectomy thrombolytic therapy |
| Zdroj: | Buus, S M Ø, Schmitz, M L, Cordsen, P, Johnsen, S P, Andersen, G & Simonsen, C Z 2022, ' Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke ', Stroke, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 2307-2316 . https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037687 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037687 |
| Popis: | Background: Reperfusion therapies (thrombolysis and thrombectomy) are of paramount importance for the recovery after ischemic stroke. We aimed to investigate if socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with the chance of receiving reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke in a country with tax-funded health care. Methods: This nationwide register-based cohort study included patients with ischemic stroke registered in the Danish Stroke Registry between 2015 and 2018. SES was determined by prestroke educational attainment, income level, and employment status. Data on SES was obtained from Statistics Denmark and linked on an individual level with data from the Danish Stroke Registry. Risk ratios (RR) for receiving reperfusion therapies were calculated using univariate and multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. Results: A total of 37 187 ischemic stroke patients were included. Low SES, as defined by education, income and employment status, was associated with lower treatment rates. The socioeconomic gradient was most pronounced according to employment status, with intravenous thrombolysis rates of 23.7% versus 15.8%, and thrombectomy rates of 5.1% versus 2.8% for employed versus unemployed patients. When the analyses were restricted to patients with timely hospital arrival, and adjusted for age, sex and immigrant status, low SES according to income and employment remained unfavorable for the likelihood of receiving intravenous thrombolysis: adjusted RR, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86–0.95) for low versus high income, and adjusted RR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71–0.84) for unemployed versus employed patients. Similarly, low SES according to income and employment status remained unfavorable for the likelihood of receiving thrombectomy: adjusted RR, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72–0.95) for low versus high income and adjusted RR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53–0.88) for unemployed versus employed patients. Conclusions: Socioeconomic inequalities in reperfusion treatment rates among ischemic stroke patients prevail, even in a country with tax-funded universal health care. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|