Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting

Autor: Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Doenja M. J. Lambregts, Monique Maas, Shandra Bipat, Brunella Barbaro, Filipe Caseiro-Alves, Luís Curvo-Semedo, Helen M. Fenlon, Marc J. Gollub, Sofia Gourtsoyianni, Steve Halligan, Christine Hoeffel, Seung Ho Kim, Andrea Laghi, Andrea Maier, Søren R. Rafaelsen, Jaap Stoker, Stuart A. Taylor, Michael R. Torkzad, Lennart Blomqvist
Přispěvatelé: Beeldvorming, MUMC+: DA BV AIOS Radiologie (9), RS: GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Zdroj: Beets-Tan, R G H, Lambregts, D M J, Maas, M, Bipat, S, Barbaro, B, Caseiro-Alves, F, Curvo-Semedo, L, Fenlon, H M, Gollub, M J, Gourtsoyianni, S, Halligan, S, Hoeffel, C, Kim, S H, Laghi, A, Maier, A, Rafaelsen, S R, Stoker, J, Taylor, S A, Torkzad, M R & Blomqvist, L 2013, ' Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients : recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting ', European Radiology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2522-2531 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2864-4
European Radiology, 23(9), 2522-2531. Springer, Cham
European radiology, 23(9), 2522-2531. Springer Verlag
ISSN: 1432-1084
0938-7994
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2864-4
Popis: To develop guidelines describing a standardised approach regarding the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinical staging and restaging of rectal cancer. A consensus meeting of 14 abdominal imaging experts from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) was conducted following the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Two independent (non-voting) chairs facilitated the meeting. Two hundred and thirty-six items were scored by participants for appropriateness and classified subsequently as appropriate or inappropriate (defined by a parts per thousand yen 80 % consensus) or uncertain (defined by
Databáze: OpenAIRE