Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published By Plastic Surgeons: Long-Term Follow-Up
Autor: | Thiago Bezerra de Morais, Miguel Sabino-Neto, Lydia Masako Ferreira, Yara Juliano, Rosely de Fátima Pellizzon, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Joel Veiga-Filho, Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Publishing
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Long term follow up business.industry media_common.quotation_subject Evidence-based medicine 030230 surgery Jadad scale law.invention 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Otorhinolaryngology Randomized controlled trial law Scale (social sciences) medicine Physical therapy Surgery Quality (business) Surgery Plastic business Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic media_common |
Zdroj: | Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 43:866-873 |
ISSN: | 1432-5241 0364-216X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00266-019-01335-3 |
Popis: | In two previous studies, the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon was evaluated in two periods: 1966–2003 and 2004–2008. To evaluate the evolution of the quality of RCT publications by plastic surgeons in the subsequent 5-year period, from 2009 to 2013. RCTs published from 2009 to 2013 in English with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon were identified by electronic search and classified for concealment of allocation by two independent evaluators. The studies with adequate allocation concealment had their quality evaluated by two evaluators using the Delphi List and the Jadad Quality Scale. Of the 6997 identified studies, 261 were classified as to concealment of allocation. Of these, 43 (16.47%) had adequate allocation concealment. According to the evaluation in the Delphi List, there was an improvement, in relation to 1966–2003, in the items “most important characteristics of the prognosis” (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |