Head-up tilt test diagnostic yield in syncope diagnosis

Autor: Carmen Barón-Solís, Macarena Quintanilla, Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias, Álvaro Marco del Castillo, Antonio J. Díaz Martín, Carlos A. Morillo
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname
ISSN: 0022-0736
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.09.016
Popis: [Background] The European Syncope Guidelines (ESG) recommend the use of Head-up tilt test (HUT) in case of suspicion of vasovagal syncope (VVS) or orthostatic hypotensive syncope (OHS) after an adequate initial inconclusive evaluation. We report a single center experience in the scenario of suspected VVS or OHS, who underwent HUT in patients referred to a Syncope Clinic after ruling out high-risk causes.
[Methods] We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopal patients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE).
[Results] We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ± 20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups: 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE.
[Conclusions] Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.
Databáze: OpenAIRE