Experimental Assessment on Exploiting Low Carbon Ethanol Fuel in a Light-Duty Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine
| Autor: | Giuseppe Di Luca, Roberto Ianniello, G. Di Blasio, Ingemar Denbratt, Carlo Beatrice, Michael Saccullo |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
020209 energy
02 engineering and technology Combustion lcsh:Technology Automotive engineering law.invention lcsh:Chemistry Diesel fuel 0203 mechanical engineering law 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering General Materials Science Ethanol fuel Exhaust gas recirculation soot emissions Instrumentation lcsh:QH301-705.5 NOx Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes business.industry lcsh:T Process Chemistry and Technology Fossil fuel General Engineering nozzle-hole number lcsh:QC1-999 Computer Science Applications Ignition system 020303 mechanical engineering & transports Mean effective pressure lcsh:Biology (General) lcsh:QD1-999 lcsh:TA1-2040 dual-fuel compression ignition engine Environmental science ethanol business lcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) lcsh:Physics |
| Zdroj: | Applied Sciences Volume 10 Issue 20 Applied Sciences, Vol 10, Iss 7182, p 7182 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2076-3417 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/app10207182 |
| Popis: | Compression ignition (CI) engines are widely used in modern society, but they are also recognized as a significative source of harmful and human hazard emissions such as particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). Moreover, the combustion of fossil fuels is related to the growing amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as carbon dioxide (CO2). Stringent emission regulatory programs, the transition to cleaner and more advanced powertrains and the use of lower carbon fuels are driving forces for the improvement of diesel engines in terms of overall efficiency and engine-out emissions. Ethanol, a light alcohol and lower carbon fuel, is a promising alternative fuel applicable in the dual-fuel (DF) combustion mode to mitigate CO2 and also engine-out PM emissions. In this context, this work aims to assess the maximum fuel substitution ratio (FSR) and the impact on CO2 and PM emissions of different nozzle holes number injectors, 7 and 9, in the DF operating mode. The analysis was conducted within engine working constraints and considered the influence on maximum FSR of calibration parameters, such as combustion phasing, rail pressure, injection pattern and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The experimental tests were carried out on a single-cylinder light-duty CI engine with ethanol introduced via port fuel injection (PFI) and direct injection of diesel in two operating points, 1500 and 2000 rpm and at 5 and 8 bar of brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), respectively. Noise and the coefficient of variation in indicated mean effective pressure (COVIMEP) limits have been chosen as practical constraints. In particular, the experimental analysis assesses for each parameter or their combination the highest ethanol fraction that can be injected. To discriminate the effect on ethanol fraction and the combustion process of each parameter, a one-at-a-time-factor approach was used. The results show that, in both operating points, the EGR reduces the maximum ethanol fraction injectable nevertheless, the ethanol addition leads to outstanding improvement in terms of engine-out PM. The adoption of a 9 hole diesel injector, for lower load, allows reaching a higher fraction of ethanol in all test conditions with an improvement in combustion noise, on average 3 dBA, while near-zero PM emissions and a reduction can be noticed, on the average of 1 g/kWh, and CO2 compared with the fewer nozzle holes case. Increasing the load insensitivity to different holes number was observed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|