Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans' commitment to democracy
Autor: | Larry M. Bartels |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
political polarization
Multidisciplinary media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Immigration Ethnic group Political Sciences Ethnic conflict Social Sciences ethnic antagonism 06 humanities and the arts support for democracy Conservatism 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Democracy 0506 political science Power (social and political) Politics Cynicism Political science Political economy 050602 political science & public administration 060301 applied ethics media_common |
Zdroj: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
ISSN: | 1091-6490 |
Popis: | Significance Growing partisan polarization and democratic “backsliding” in various parts of the world have raised concerns about the attachment of ordinary Americans to democratic institutions and procedures. I find that substantial numbers of Republicans endorse statements contemplating violations of key democratic norms, including respect for the law and for the outcomes of elections and eschewing the use of force in pursuit of political ends. The strongest predictor by far of these antidemocratic attitudes is ethnic antagonism—especially concerns about the political power and claims on government resources of immigrants, African-Americans, and Latinos. The strong tendency of ethnocentric Republicans to countenance violence and lawlessness, even prospectively and hypothetically, underlines the significance of ethnic conflict in contemporary US politics. Most Republicans in a January 2020 survey agreed that “the traditional American way of life is disappearing so fast that we may have to use force to save it.” More than 40% agreed that “a time will come when patriotic Americans have to take the law into their own hands.” (In both cases, most of the rest said they were unsure; only one in four or five disagreed.) I use 127 survey items to measure six potential bases of these and other antidemocratic sentiments: partisan affect, enthusiasm for President Trump, political cynicism, economic conservatism, cultural conservatism, and ethnic antagonism. The strongest predictor by far, for the Republican rank-and-file as a whole and for a variety of subgroups defined by education, locale, sex, and political attitudes, is ethnic antagonism—especially concerns about the political power and claims on government resources of immigrants, African-Americans, and Latinos. The corrosive impact of ethnic antagonism on Republicans’ commitment to democracy underlines the significance of ethnic conflict in contemporary US politics. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |