A case study on the improvement of institution of 'High-Risk High-Return R&D' in Korea
Autor: | Hee Ju Jun, Mee Hyang Chang, Byung Yong Hwang, Dae Cheol Kim |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Engineering
Economic growth Entrepreneurship lcsh:Management. Industrial management Sociology and Political Science media_common.quotation_subject 0211 other engineering and technologies Accounting 02 engineering and technology Development lcsh:Business 050905 science studies National R& ddc:650 High-risk high-return R&D Institution National R&D program media_common Government spending Government Life-cycle perspective D Life-cycle perspective R& business.industry 05 social sciences National R&D program High-risk high-return R&D Life-cycle perspective R&D performance D performance 021107 urban & regional planning Creativity Incentive lcsh:HD28-70 Accountability D program High-risk high-return R& 0509 other social sciences business lcsh:HF5001-6182 General Economics Econometrics and Finance R&D performance Autonomy |
Zdroj: | Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity; Volume 3; Issue 3; Pages: 19 Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, Vol 3, Iss 3, p 19 (2017) |
ISSN: | 2199-8531 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9 |
Popis: | Despite the increase of government spending on R&D in South Korea, there have been limits in enhancing the challenging trait and creativity of research outcomes. A new approach to the current mode of R&D is considered necessary to tackle this problem. In 2015, South Korea operated fifteen programs, namely “High-risk Highreturn R&D,” from seven government ministries. The purpose of this study is to examine the actual conditions for adoption and to further promote early establishment and wide implementation of the new “High-risk High-return policy” in National R&D, and to suggest ways to improve it. In this study, we have approached the case with a life-cycle perspective of planmanagement- evaluation of R&D by carrying out a survey and unstandardized interviews with key staff from R&D management agencies. Based on the results of the analysis, we suggest improvements in three aspects: 1) flexible system operation, 2) government ministries’ autonomy and accountability, 3) effective incentives. Finally, we discuss possible improvements, future directions, and the limits of this study. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |