A Cost-Effectiveness Protocol for Flood-Mitigation Plans Based on Leeds’ Boxing Day 2015 Floods

Autor: Guillaume Piton, Thomas Kent, Jean-Marc Tacnet, Onno Bokhove, Mark A. Kelmanson
Přispěvatelé: School of Mathematics [Leeds], University of Leeds, Erosion torrentielle neige et avalanches (UR ETGR (ETNA)), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) : EP/M008525/1, Sarah Dance's EPSRC Data Science Fellowship 'Data Assimilation for the REsilient City' : EP/P002331/1, European Project: 730497,NAIAD, School of Mathematics - University of Leeds
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
lcsh:Hydraulic engineering
Operations research
Computer science
Cost effectiveness
Geography
Planning and Development

0207 environmental engineering
02 engineering and technology
010501 environmental sciences
Aquatic Science
01 natural sciences
Biochemistry
lcsh:Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
lcsh:TC1-978
citizen science
Citizen science
[SPI.GCIV.RISQ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Civil Engineering/Risques
Flood mitigation
[SDU.STU.GM]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Geomorphology
[SDU.STU.HY]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology
020701 environmental engineering
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Water Science and Technology
Protocol (science)
Upstream (petroleum industry)
Estimation
lcsh:TD201-500
Flood myth
[SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering
Flooding (psychology)
holistic decision-making
cost-effectiveness analysis
[SPI.GCIV.CH]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Civil Engineering/Construction hydraulique
flood-excess volume
flood-mitigation assessment
Zdroj: Water
Water, 2020, 12 (3), pp.652. ⟨10.3390/w12030652⟩
Water, MDPI, 2020, 12 (3), pp.652. ⟨10.3390/w12030652⟩
Volume 12
Issue 3
Water, Vol 12, Iss 3, p 652 (2020)
ISSN: 2073-4441
Popis: Inspired by the Boxing Day 2015 flood of the River Aire in Leeds, UK, and subsequent attempts to mitigate adverse consequences of flooding, the goals considered are: (i) to revisit the concept of flood-excess volume (FEV) as a complementary diagnostic for classifying flood events
(ii) to establish a new roadmap/protocol for assessing flood-mitigation schemes using FEV
and, (iii) to provide a clear, graphical cost-effectiveness analysis of flood mitigation, exemplified for a hypothetical scheme partially based on actual plans. We revisit the FEV concept and present it as a three-panel graph using thresholds and errors. By re-expressing FEV as a 2 m -deep square lake of equivalent capacity, one can visualise its dimensions in comparison with the river valley considered. Cost-effectiveness of flood-mitigation measures is expressed within the FEV square-lake
different scenarios of our hypothetical flood-mitigation scheme are then presented and assessed graphically, with each scenario involving a combination, near and further upstream of Leeds, of higher (than existing) flood-defence walls, enhanced flood-plain storage sites, giving-room-to-the-river bed-widening and natural flood management. Our cost-effectiveness analysis is intended as a protocol to compare and choose between flood-mitigation scenarios in a quantifiable and visual manner, thereby offering better prospects of being understood by a wide audience, including citizens and city-council planners. Using techniques of data analysis combined with general river hydraulics, common-sense and upper-bound estimation, we offer an accessible check of flood-mitigation plans.
Databáze: OpenAIRE