Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology
| Autor: | Orawan Laoaree, Kitisak Thepsuwan, Anong Krachang, Jitraporn Tanabodee, Nualpan Anontwatanawong, Anant Karalak, Kittipong Manmatt |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Cancer Research Pathology medicine.medical_specialty Epidemiology Cytodiagnosis Bethesda system Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cervical cell Conventional cytology Cytology Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix Humans Medicine Early Detection of Cancer Aged Vaginal Smears medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Cancer Gold standard (test) Middle Aged Prognosis Thailand Uterine Cervical Dysplasia medicine.disease Oncology Liquid-based cytology Female Radiology Neoplasm Grading business Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 16:7381-7384 |
| ISSN: | 1513-7368 |
| DOI: | 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7381 |
| Popis: | This study was conducted to 1206 women who had cervical cancer screening at Chonburi Cancer Hospital. The spilt-sample study aimed to compare the efficacy of abnormal cervical cells detection between liquid-based cytology (LBC) and conventional cytology (CC). The collection of cervical cells was performed by broom and directly smeared on a glass slide for CC then the rest of specimen was prepared for LBC. All slides were evaluated and classified by The Bethesda System. The results of the two cytological tests were compared to the gold standard. The LBC smear significantly decreased inflammatory cell and thick smear on slides. These two techniques were not difference in detection rate of abnormal cytology and had high cytological diagnostic agreement of 95.7%. The histologic diagnosis of cervical tissue was used as the gold standard in 103 cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive, false negative and accuracy of LBC at ASC-US cut off were 81.4, 75.0, 70.0, 84.9, 25.0, 18.6 and 77.7%, respectively. CC had higher false positive and false negative than LBC. LBC had shown higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy than CC but no statistical significance. In conclusion, LBC method can improve specimen quality, more sensitive, specific and accurate at ASC-US cut off and as effective as CC in detecting cervical epithelial cell abnormalities. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|