Biomarkers for the early stages of clinical development in Alzheimer's disease
Autor: | Régis Bordet, Jean-François Dartigues, Bruno Dubois, Jean-Marie Goehrs, Laura Vernoux, Franck Semah, Florence Pasquier, Claude Bidaut-Mazel, Zeina Antoun, Olivier Arnaud, Olivier Blin, Antoine Coquerel, Catherine Deguines, Philippe Derambure, Patrice Dosquet, Jean-Pierre Duffet, Sylvia Goni, Philippe Gustovic, Marie Lang, Marie-Laure Laroche, Antoine Pariente, Jean-Jacques Pere, Odile Regnier, Philippe Truffinet |
---|---|
Jazyk: | francouzština |
Rok vydání: | 2010 |
Předmět: |
Protocol (science)
Pathology medicine.medical_specialty business.industry MEDLINE Disease Middle Aged Phase (combat) Witness Clinical trial Clinical Trials Phase II as Topic Risk analysis (engineering) Drug development Clinical Trials Phase III as Topic Alzheimer Disease Disease Progression Biomarker (medicine) Medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Age of Onset business Biomarkers Nootropic Agents Aged |
Zdroj: | Therapie. 65(4) |
ISSN: | 0040-5957 |
Popis: | As the failure of several recent Phase III drug development programmes bears witness, the clinical development of “disease-modifying” drugs in Alzheimer’s disease has been confronted with challenging methodological difficulties. Taking into account the financial stakes involved taking drug candidates to the Phase III stage of development, and the risk of investing time and resources fruitlessly in the evaluation of poor candidate drugs, the crucial decision remains whether to proceed from Phase II to Phase III (Go/Nogo). The aim of Phase II studies is to select a molecule likely to be effective in Phase III, but also to eliminate candidate-drugs with an inadequate effect. No consensus currently exists on the best possible design of Phase II studies to inform the Go/Nogo decision optimally. The challenges in choosing the best study design relate to the target population, the end-point criteria used, in particular the use of biomarkers, the experimental protocol, and the study duration. The objective of the Round Table (RT) was to gather the opinions of French experts from the academic, industrial, and regulatory world in order to arrive at a consensus recommendation for the best possible design to be used in Phase II studies in Alzheimer’s disease. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |