Reliability of Self-reported Treatment Data by Patients With Breast Cancer Compared With Medical Record Data

Autor: Perla J Marang-van de Mheen, Esther Bastiaannet, Melissa Kool, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_treatment
Medical Records
0302 clinical medicine
Breast cancer
Positive predicative value
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
030212 general & internal medicine
Breast
Mastectomy
Netherlands
Aged
80 and over

Medical record
Sentinel node
Middle Aged
Reliability
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Oncology
Chemotherapy
Adjuvant

030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Lymphatic Metastasis
Hospital Information Systems
Female
Self-reported data
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Breast Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Agreement
03 medical and health sciences
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Aged
business.industry
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
Reproducibility of Results
Odds ratio
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
Surgery
Radiation therapy
Axilla
Lymph Node Excision
Treatment data
Self Report
business
Zdroj: Clinical Breast Cancer
Clinical Breast Cancer, 18(3), 234-238
ISSN: 1938-0666
Popis: Objectives Medical records are considered the gold standard for accurate treatment information. However, treatment data are increasingly obtained from questionnaires. It can be questioned whether self-reported treatment data are reliable, particularly because patients have to process a lot of information during their diagnosis and treatment process. The present study assesses the reliability of self-reported treatment data compared with medical records. Methods All patients with stage I, II, and III breast cancer (n = 606) in 5 hospitals in the west of the Netherlands were invited to complete a questionnaire 9 to 18 months after surgery. We calculated kappa statistics, proportion correct, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to assess agreement. Results Three hundred fifty patients completed the questionnaire (58%). Agreement was good for type of surgery and receiving chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and radiation therapy, with sensitivity and specificity of 95% or higher and kappa above 0.90. However, only moderate agreement was seen for sentinel node biopsy, including the pathologic results and axillary lymph node dissection (kappa between 0.60 and 0.80). Lack of agreement was more often found for patients who had received endocrine therapy (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.10) but not influenced by age (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.02). Conclusion Accuracy of self-reported data is high for type of surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and radiation therapy, but much lower for sentinel node biopsy including the pathologic results and axillary lymph node dissection. This is relevant for clinicians given the time spent explaining these procedures, and for researchers to help decide what information to obtain from patients or medical records.
Databáze: OpenAIRE