Regenerating mature Aleppo pine stands in fire-free conditions: Site preparation treatments matter
Autor: | Bernard Prévosto, Louis Amandier, Christian Ripert, Thierry Quesney, Gautier de Boisgelin |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Ecosystèmes méditerranéens et risques (UR EMAX), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Aucun, CRPF, ONF, Unité territoriale de Vigneulles |
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
REGENERATION NATURELLE
animal structures Range (biology) Management Monitoring Policy and Law Biology BRULAGE DIRIGE complex mixtures Mediterranean Basin Aleppo Pine Botany Scarification Nature and Landscape Conservation Slash (logging) fungi PINUS HALEPENSIS PREPARATION DU TERRAIN food and beverages Forestry biology.organism_classification DEBROUSSAILLEMENT REMANENT TRAITEMENT DES REMANENTS Agronomy Seedling [SDE]Environmental Sciences ECLAIRCIE FORET MEDITERRANEENNE Soil fertility Woody plant |
Zdroj: | Forest Ecology and Management Forest Ecology and Management, Elsevier, 2012, p. 70-p. 77. ⟨10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.043⟩ |
ISSN: | 0378-1127 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.043 |
Popis: | Aleppo pine is the most widespread pine species around the Mediterranean Basin. Its post-fire recruitment has been studied in depth, but regeneration of mature stands in fire-free conditions has received considerably less attention. This study examines the impact of different site preparation treatments on pine recruitment using three experimental mature stands along a gradient of site fertility in southeastern France. The stands were partially felled and subjected to the following treatments replicated four times on each site: mechanical chopping (all sites), chopping followed by single soil scarification (all sites) or double scarification (2 sites), controlled fire of low intensity (2 sites) or of high intensity (1 site) and control (all sites). In addition, the influence of slash, either left on the soil or removed before treatments, was tested for the single scarification treatment on two of the sites. Pine regeneration was counted and soil cover conditions described at different time intervals: 1–6 years after the end of the treatments for two sites and 1–16 years for one site. Seedling dimensions were determined during the last count. Mean seedling densities after 6–9 years (0.57–1.06 pines/m2) were comparable to those found in post-fire conditions, although with a narrower range. Pine density was negligible in the control, while chopping followed by a single soil scarification emerged as the most favourable treatment tested in the three sites on seedling density (0.74–1.54 pines/m2 after 6–9 years) and seedling growth. For this treatment, the amount of slash had a contrasting influence on pine density according to site conditions. Double scarification did not affect pine density. Controlled high intensity fire, due to slash presence, was very favourable for pine regeneration (2.35 pines/m2), although this treatment was only tested at one site. Lastly, we found low pine densities in the chopping and low-intensity controlled fire treatments (0.20–0.56 pines/m2). Variation in herb cover was a major factor influencing pine recruitment. This study emphasises the need for adapted site preparation treatments to regenerate mature pine stands in southern Europe. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |