Comparison of Cost and Perioperative Outcome Profiles for Primary and Revision Posterior Cervical Fusion Procedures
| Autor: | Jeremy Steinberger, Alexander J. Schupper, Michael L Martini, Jonathan S. Gal, William H Shuman, Emily K Chapman, Rebecca B Baron, Sean N Neifert, Ian T McNeill, John M. Caridi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
MEDLINE Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion law.invention Postoperative Complications law Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Retrospective Studies business.industry Emergency department Perioperative medicine.disease Intensive care unit Comorbidity Surgery Spinal Fusion Treatment Outcome Cohort Cervical Vertebrae Spinal Diseases Neurology (clinical) business Complication Diskectomy |
| Zdroj: | Spine. 46:1295-1301 |
| ISSN: | 1528-1159 0362-2436 |
| Popis: | STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative outcomes and hospitalization costs between patients undergoing primary or revision posterior cervical discectomy and fusion (PCDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA While prior studies found differences in outcomes between primary and revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), risk, and outcome profiles for posterior cervical revision procedures have not yet been elucidated. METHODS Institutional records were queried for cases involving isolated PCDF procedures to evaluate preoperative characteristics and outcomes for patients undergoing primary versus revision PCDF between 2008 and 2016. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, while perioperative and resource utilization measures such as hospitalization length, required stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), direct hospitalization costs, and 30-day emergency department (ED) admissions were explored as secondary outcomes. RESULTS One thousand one hundred twenty four patients underwent PCDF, with 218 (19.4%) undergoing a revision procedure. Patients undergoing revision procedures were younger (53.0 vs. 60.5 yrs), but had higher Elixhauser scores compared with the non-revision cohort. Revision cases tended to involve fewer spinal segments (3.6 vs. 4.1 segments) and shorter surgical durations (179.3 vs. 206.3 min), without significant differences in estimated blood loss. There were no significant differences in the overall complication rates (P = 0.20), however, the primary cohort had greater rates of required ICU stays (P = 0.0005) and non-home discharges (P = 0.0003). The revision cohort did experience significantly increased odds of 30-day ED admission (P = 0.04) and had higher direct hospitalization (P = 0.03) and surgical (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|