Dryinidae Haliday 1833

Autor: Derafshan, Hossein Ali, Olmi, Massimo, Moghaddam, Mostafa Ghafouri, Nader, Elham, Rakhshani, Ehsan
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5576498
Popis: KEY TO THE IRANIAN DRYINIDAE FEMALES 1. Protarsus chelate (Fig. 2 A-D)...................................................................................................................... 2 — Protarsus not chelate [Aphelopinae R. Perkins, 1912, in Iran only Aphelopus Dalman, 1823]...................... 5 2. Chela with one rudimentary claw (Fig. 2C, D)........................................................................................... 3 — Chela without rudimentary claw (Fig. 2A, B) [Anteoninae R. Perkins, 1912, in Iran only Anteon Jurine, 1807].......................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Median leg with one tibial spur (formula 1/1/1 or 1/1/2)............................................................................ 4 — Median leg without tibial spurs (formula 1/0/1 or 1/0/2)..................................................................................................................... [Gonatopodinae Kieffer, 1906; see Derafshan et al. 2020, for key to Iranian species] 4. Epicnemium concealed (Fig. 11D) [Bocchinae Richards, 1939].................................................................. 7 — Epicnemium exposed [Dryininae Haliday, 1833]........................................................................................ 8 5. Head with mandibles, clypeus and lower parts of frontal region white or testaceous.................................................................................................................................................... Aphelopus melaleucus (Dalman, 1818) — Head with mandibles white or testaceous; clypeus uniformly black; rest of head black (Fig. 9A)...................................................................................................................................... Aphelopus orphanidesi Olmi, 1994 6. Protarsomere 4 at most 0.5 as long as protarsomere 1; protarsomere 3 or 4 produced into hook (Fig. 2A)............................................................................................................................ Anteon abdulnouri Olmi, 1987 — Protarsomere 4 at least 0.66 as long as protarsomere 1; protarsomere 2 produced into hook (Fig. 2B)............................................................................................................................... Anteon pubicorne (Dalman, 1818) 7. Segment 5 of protarsus with inner membranous band, two bristles and with one preapical lamella (Fig. 2C)........................................................................................................................... Bocchus hyalinus Olmi, 1998 — Segment 5 of protarsus without inner membranous band, with 1 row of about 18 lamellae and 1 row of about 7 bristles, distal apex with approximately 4-10 lamellae............................ Mirodryinus atlanticus Olmi, 1984 8. Enlarged claw with one subapical tooth................................................. Dryinus tarraconensis Marshall, 1868 — Enlarged claw without subapical teeth or with many small subapical teeth.................................................. 9 9. Posterior ocelli not touching occipital carina. Enlarged claw with many small subapical teeth................................................................................................................................................... Dryinus gharaeii Olmi, 2005 — Posterior ocelli touching occipital carina. Enlarged claw without subapical teeth.......................................................................................................................................... Dryinus tamaricicola Rakhshani & Olmi, 2016 MALES 1. Fore wing with three cells (Costal, radial and first cubital) enclosed by pigmented veins (Figs 5E, 11E)...... 2 — Fore wing with only the costal cell enclosed by pigmented veins (Figs 8E, 10E) [Aphelopinae R. Perkins, 1912: in Iran only Aphelopus Dalman, 1823]........................................................................................................ 5 2. Hypopygium not umbrella-shaped [Anteoninae R. Perkins, 1912: in Iran only Anteon Jurine, 1807].......... 6 — Hypopygium umbrella-shaped.................................................................................................................... 3 3. Epicnemium concealed [Bocchinae Richards, 1939].................................................................................... 7 — Epicnemium exposed.................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Occipital carina complete or incomplete. Dorsal process of paramere absent [Dryininae Haliday, 1833]..... 8 — Occipital carina absent, occasionally present and complete. Dorsal process of paramere present........................................................... [Gonatopodinae Kieffer, 1906; see Derafshan et al. 2020 for key to Iranian species] 5. Aedeagus with distal apex not trumpet-shaped (Fig. 3C)...................... Aphelopus melaleucus (Dalman, 1818) — Aedeagus with distal apex trumpet-shaped (Fig. 3D)................................. Aphelopus orphanidesi Olmi, 1994 6. Propodeal declivity without longitudinal keels (Fig. 5D). Paramere without inner distal and pointed process (Fig. 3A)......................................................................................................... Anteon abdulnouri Olmi, 1987 — Propodeal declivity with two longitudinal keels. Paramere with distal inner pointed process (Fig. 3B).............................................................................................................................. Anteon pubicorne (Dalman, 1818) 7. Metapectal-propodeal disc with strong transverse posterior keel and two complete longitudinal keels, areolae very wide (Fig. 11F). Genitalia with distivolsella articulated along inner margin of basivolsella (Fig. 3E).................................................................................................................................. Bocchus hyalinus Olmi, 1998 — Metapectal-propodeal disc without longitudinal or transverse keel, areolae very small. Genitalia with distivolsella articulated on distal margin of basivolsella................................................ Mirodryinus atlanticus Olmi, 1984 8. Antennal segments broad, with segment 3 less than six times as long as broad.............................................................................................................................................................. Dryinus tarraconensis Marshall, 1868 — Antennal segments slender, with segment 3 seven or more than seven times as long as broad....................................................................................................................... Dryinus tamaricicola Rakhshani & Olmi, 2016
Published as part of Derafshan, Hossein Ali, Olmi, Massimo, Moghaddam, Mostafa Ghafouri, Nader, Elham & Rakhshani, Ehsan, 2021, New records of Dryinidae Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea) from Iran, pp. 563-583 in Zoosystema 43 (23) on pages 580-581, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2021v43a23, http://zenodo.org/record/5572947
{"references":["PERKINS R. C. L. 1912. - Parasites of the Family Dryinidae. Report of Work of the Experiment Station of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Division of Entomology, Bulletin 11: 5 - 20.","DALMAN J. W. 1823. - Analecta entomologica. Typis Lindhianis, Holmiae, 104 p. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 66069","JURINE L. 1807. - Nouvelle methode de classer les Hymenopteres et les Dipteres, 1. Hymenopteres. Paschoud, Geneve, 319 p. [Switzerland]","KIEFFER J. J. & MARSHALL T. A. 1906. - Proctotrypidae. In Andre E. (Ed.), Species des Hymenopteres d'Europe et d'Algerie. Vol. 9. Hermann, Paris: 289 - 552.","DERAFSHAN H. A., OLMI M., GHAFOURI MOGHADDAM M. & RAKHSHANI E. 2020. - Taxonomic study of the subfamily Gonatopodinae Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea, Dryinidae) from Iran with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 4789: 371 - 402. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4789.2.3","RICHARDS O. W. 1939. - The British Bethylidae (s. l.) (Hymenoptera). The Transactions of the Royal entomological Society of London 89: 185 - 344. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1939. tb 00740. x","HALIDAY A. H. 1833. - An essay on the classification of the Parasitic Hymenoptera of Britain, which correspond with the Ichneumones minuti of Linnaeus. The Entomological Magazine 1: 259 - 273.","DALMAN J. W. 1818. - Nagra nya genera och species af insekter beskrifna. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 39: 69 - 89.","OLMI M. 1987. - Descrizione di nuove specie di Dryinidae (Hymenoptera Chrysidoidea). Bollettino di Zoologia agraria e di Bachicoltura, Ser. II, 19: 31 - 70.","OLMI M. 1998 [1997]. - New Embolemidae and Dryinidae (Hymenoptera Chrysidoidea). Frustula entomologica, New Series 20 (33): 30 - 118.","OLMI M. 1984. - A revision of the Dryinidae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 37: I-XII + 1 - 1913.","MARSHALL T. A. 1868. - On some British Diapriidae. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 4: 201 - 209.","OLMI M. 2005. - Dryinus gharaeii sp. nov. from Iran (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea, Dryinidae). Entomologist's Gazette 56: 207 - 209."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: