Autor: |
Pedro A, Sousa, Luís, Puga, Sérgio, Barra, Luís, Adão, João, Primo, Ziad, Khoueiry, Ana, Lebreiro, Paulo, Fonseca, Mariana, Pereira, Philippe, Lagrange, Andre, d'Avila, Bárbara, Oliveiros, Luís, Elvas, Lino, Gonçalves |
Rok vydání: |
2023 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
International Journal of Cardiology. 370:209-214 |
ISSN: |
0167-5273 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.10.013 |
Popis: |
To compare the two different ablation strategies, both guided by the Ablation Index (AI), in the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation: high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation using 40 W on the posterior wall and 50 W elsewhere versus low-power long-duration (LPLD) using 25 W posteriorly and 35 W elsewhere.Prospective, multicenter nonrandomized, noninferiority study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal AF ablation from January 2018 to July 2019. Ablation was guided by the AI (≥500 for anterior segments, ≥450 for the roof and inferior segments and 400 posteriorly) and an interlesion distance (ILD) ≤ 6 mm. Patients were separated into two groups: HPSD vs LPLD. Acute reconnection (after adenosine trial) and 2-year outcomes were assessed.160 patients (61% males, median age of 62 [IQR 51-69] years), fulfilled the study inclusion criteria - 80 patients (316 pulmonary veins [PV]) in the HPSD group and 80 patients (314 PV) in the LPLD. The probability of acute PV reconnection was similar between both groups: 2.2% in HPSD, 95%CI 0.6% to 3.8% vs. 3.4% in LPLD, 95%CI 1.4% to 5.4%; p 0.001 for noninferiority. Median PV ablation time (20 min vs 30 min, p 0.01) and procedure duration (80 min vs 100 min, p 0.001) were shorter in the HPSD group. After a median follow-up of 26 months, arrhythmia recurrence was similar between groups (17.5% in HPSD group vs. 18.8% in LPLD group, p = 0.79).In paroxysmal AF patients treated with the Ablation Index, a HPSD strategy is noninferior to the more standard LPLD ablation, while allowing for quicker procedures with shorter ablation times. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|