The role of glutamate dehydrogenase for the detection of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples: a meta-analysis
Autor: | Nandini Shetty, M.W.D. Wren, Pietro G Coen |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
medicine.disease_cause Sensitivity and Specificity Microbiology Feces Glutamate Dehydrogenase Humans Medicine Clostridiaceae Bacteriological Techniques Cross Infection Receiver operating characteristic biology Clostridioides difficile business.industry Toxin Glutamate dehydrogenase General Medicine Gold standard (test) Clostridium difficile biology.organism_classification Diarrhea Infectious Diseases Clostridium Infections medicine.symptom business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Hospital Infection. 77:1-6 |
ISSN: | 0195-6701 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.07.024 |
Popis: | Clostridium difficile causes a serious, occasionally fatal, hospital-acquired infection. The laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI) needs to be accurate to ensure optimal patient management, infection control and reliable surveillance. Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for C. difficile toxins have poor sensitivity when compared with cell culture cytotoxin assay (CTA) and toxigenic culture (TC). We performed a meta-analysis of the role of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) in diagnosis of CDI. We analysed 21 papers, of which eight were excluded. We included publications of original research that used a 'gold standard' reference test (either CTA or TC). We also included publications that used culture without toxin testing of the isolate as a reference test even though this is not recognised as a gold standard. Exclusion criteria were failure to use a gold standard reference test and where the index test was used as the gold standard. Significant heterogeneity between study results justified the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy of GDH for the presence of C. difficile in faeces; when compared with culture it achieved a sensitivity and specificity of >90%. The SROC plot confirmed this finding. As a surrogate for toxigenic strains the GDH yields a specificity of 80-100% with a false positivity rate of ∼20%, as it detects toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of the organism. However, GDH test has high sensitivity and negative predictive value and would be a powerful test in a dual testing algorithm when combined with a test to detect toxin. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |