Validation of the Status epilepticus severity score (STESS) at high-complexity hospitals in Medellín, Colombia
Autor: | Olga Helena Hernández, Diana Marcela Díaz, Juan Pablo Millán Sandoval, Luisa María Escobar del Rio, José Fernando Zapata, Lady Diana Ladino, Edison Augusto Gómez, Lina María López Ospina |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Status epilepticus Colombia Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing Severity of Illness Index 03 medical and health sciences Colombian population 0302 clinical medicine Status Epilepticus High complexity Internal medicine Medicine Cutoff Humans In patient Hospital Mortality Receiver operating characteristic business.industry General Medicine Prognosis Hospitals Neurology ROC Curve Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom business Complication 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Seizure. 81 |
ISSN: | 1532-2688 |
Popis: | The Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) is one of the most well-known clinical scoring systems to predict mortality in status epilepticus (SE). The objective of this study was to validate STESS in a Colombian population.We evaluated historical data of adult patients (age ≥16 years) with a clinical or electroencephalographic diagnosis of SE admitted between 2014 and 2017. Prospectively, we included patients admitted from January to June of 2018. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis, determination of best cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were performed.The sample was 395 patients, with in-hospital mortality of 16.8 %. The area under the ROC curve for STESS was 0.84. A cutoff point of ≥3 produced the highest sensitivity of 84.9 % (95 % CI 73.9 %-92.5 %) and a specificity of 65.7 % (95 % CI 60.2 %-70.8 %), with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.5 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.2.STESS is a useful tool to predict mortality in patients with SE. In Medellin, Colombia, a STESS 3 allows the identification of the patients who survive reliably. Those patients with a score3 may have a better prognosis, and treatment with fewer side effects than anaesthetics could be suggested, always remembering the importance of the treating physician's clinical judgement. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |