Assessing the impact of unilateral trade policies EBA and AGOA on African beneficiaries' exports using matching econometrics
Autor: | Joseph Tharakan, Zakaria Sorgho |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | UCL - SSH/LIDAM/CORE - Center for operations research and econometrics |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Economics and Econometrics
Matching (statistics) 050208 finance African trade Everything but arms African growth and apportunity act non-reciprocal preferences agreements 05 social sciences Beneficiary International economics treatment effects Everything but Arms Work (electrical) Order (exchange) Accounting 0502 economics and business Political Science and International Relations Human development (biology) Economics Endogeneity 050207 economics Political stability Matching econometrics Finance |
Zdroj: | The World Economy, Vol. 42, no.10, p. 3086-3118 (2019) |
ISSN: | 1467-9701 0378-5920 |
DOI: | 10.1111/twec.12842 |
Popis: | The existing literature studying the impact of non‐reciprocal preferential trade agreements (NRPTAs) assumes implicitly NRPTAs are non‐randomly assigned without showing the evidence of that. Using a matching methodology, this paper investigates whether the “African Growth and Opportunity Act” (AGOA) and the “Everything But Arms” (EBA) unilateral trade concessions have had an impact, and in what magnitude, on the exports of African beneficiary countries in the light of the evidence of the non‐random nature (endogeneity) of NRPTAs. Methodologically, previous studies using the matching procedure focused on bi or multilateral trade agreements. Our work focuses on NRPTAs that depend only on donors' conditions. Accordingly, we show that for NRPTAs, gravity covariates cannot be used for the matching procedure. We propose to use political variables as determinants for obtaining non‐reciprocal trade preferences in order to address the endogenous nature of NRPTA assignment. Our main results confirm that a country becomes eligible for a NRPTA only when it meets certain conditions, defined by their donors, such as political stability and economic regulation (for AGOA), and freedom of expression and human development (for EBA). Results also show that both AGOA and EBA policies have had a positive impact on African beneficiary countries' exports to NRPTA's providers, even if the magnitude impact of EBA is significantly lower than that of AGOA. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |