Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room

Autor: Janet Buatsi, Heinz Zimmermann, Martin Rohacek, Zsolt Szucs-Farkas, C. Stoupis, Birgit Kleim, Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos
Přispěvatelé: University of Zurich, Rohacek, Martin
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: Rohacek, Martin; Buatsi, Janet; Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt; Kleim, Birgit; Zimmermann, Heinz; Exadaktylos, Aristomenis; Stoupis, Christoforos (2012). Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room. Intensive care medicine, 38(8), pp. 1345-51. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 10.1007/s00134-012-2595-z
DOI: 10.7892/boris.13525
Popis: Purpose: To identify reasons for ordering computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), to identify the frequency of reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior and evidence-based behavior, and to identify the impact of defensive medicine and of training about diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on positive results of CTPA. Methods: Physicians in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital completed a questionnaire before CTPA after being trained about diagnosing PE and completing questionnaires. Results: Nine hundred patients received a CTPA during 3years. For 328 CTPAs performed during the 1-year study period, 140 (43%) questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for ordering a CTPA were to confirm/rule out PE (93%), elevated D-dimers (66%), fear of missing PE (55%), and Wells/simplified revised Geneva score (53%). A positive answer for "fear of missing PE” was inversely associated with positive CTPA (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.92, p=0.033), and "Wells/simplified revised Geneva score” was associated with positive CTPA (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.24-8.68, p=0.017). The proportion of positive CTPA was higher if a questionnaire was completed, compared to the 2-year comparison period (26.4 vs. 14.5%, OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.36-3.29, p
Databáze: OpenAIRE