Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human–Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography
Autor: | Amélia Frazão-Moreira, Matthew R. McLennan, Hannah Parathian, Kimberley J. Hockings, Catherine M. Hill |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Conservation conflict Primate conservation Multispecies ethnography Ethnoprimatology Interdisciplinary research 010603 evolutionary biology 01 natural sciences Article Terminology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 050102 behavioral science & comparative psychology Sociology Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Primatology Human–wildlife conflict 05 social sciences Human–wildlife interactions Environmental ethics Social research Animal ecology Animal Science and Zoology Discipline Meaning (linguistics) |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Primatology |
ISSN: | 1573-8604 0164-0291 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9 |
Popis: | One of the main challenges when integrating biological and social perspectives in primatology is overcoming interdisciplinary barriers. Unfamiliarity with subject-specific theory and language, distinct disciplinary-bound approaches to research, and academic boundaries aimed at “preserving the integrity” of subject disciplines can hinder developments in interdisciplinary research. With growing interest in how humans and other primates share landscapes, and recognition of the importance of combining biological and social information to do this effectively, the disparate use of terminology is becoming more evident. To tackle this problem, we dissect the meaning of what the biological sciences term studies in “human–wildlife conflict” or more recently “human–wildlife interactions” and compare it to what anthropology terms “multispecies ethnography.” In the biological sciences, human–wildlife interactions are the actions resulting from people and wild animals sharing landscapes and resources, with outcomes ranging from being beneficial or harmful to one or both species. In the social sciences, human–nonhuman relationships have been explored on a philosophical, analytical, and empirical level. Building on previous work, we advocate viewing landscapes through an interdisciplinary “multispecies lens” in which humans are observed as one of multiple organisms that interact with other species to shape and create environments. To illustrate these interconnections we use the case study of coexistence between people of the Nalu ethnic group and Critically Endangered western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Cantanhez National Park in Guinea-Bissau, to demonstrate how biological and social research approaches can be complementary and can inform conservation initiatives at the human–primate interface. Finally, we discuss how combining perspectives from ethnoprimatology with those from multispecies ethnography can advance the study of ethnoprimatology to aid productive discourse and enhance future interdisciplinary research. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |