Spanish multicenter real – life registry of retrievable vena cava filters (REFiVeC)
| Autor: | Sergio Sierre, José Urbano, William T. Kuo, José A. Guirola, Javier Blazquez Sanchez, David Jiménez, Jose J. Muñoz, Ana Lucía Figueredo, Javier Guerrero, Miguel Ángel de Gregorio, Antonio Lopez-Medina, Ignacio Díaz-Lorenzo, Elena Villacastin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system Venous thrombotic disease (VTD) Inferior vena cava filter 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Inferior vena cava filters Inferior vena cava 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Venous thromboembolic disease Retrievable filters medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Major complication Contraindication Vena cava filters medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Interventional radiology Surgery medicine.vein lcsh:RC666-701 Systemic anticoagulation Original Article Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza instname CVIR Endovascular, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) CVIR Endovascular Zaguán: Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza Universidad de Zaragoza |
| Popis: | Background The treatment of venous thromboembolic disease the treatment of choice is systemic anticoagulation. However, the interruption of the inferior vena cava with filters has been recommended when anticoagulation fails or there is a contraindication. Due to the rising inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) complications, physicians are encouraged to retrieve them when there is no longer recommended. In daily practice, it may be a difficult close follow-up of these patients. In this study, the primary objective was to evaluate the IVCF retrieval rate of all implanted filters in a Spanish registry. Secondary objectives were to analyze the causes of failed retrieval, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at a 12-month follow-up. Results Three hundred fifty-six vena cava filters were implanted in 355 patients. The types of filter were: Gunther Tulip (Cook Medical) 160 (44.9%), Optease (Cordis) 77 (21.6%), Celect (Cook Medical) 49 (13, 7%), Aegisy (Lifetech Scientific) 33 (9.2%), Option ELITE (Argon Medical devices) 16 (4.4%), Denali filter (BD Bard) 11 (3.08%), ALN filter (ALN) 10 (2.8%). Removal was achieved in 274/356 (76,9%). eighty-two (23,1%) IVCF were not retrieved due to the following: 41 (11,5%) patients required ongoing filtration, 24 IVCF (6,7%) patients died before retrieval, and 17 (4,7%) impossibility of retrieval because of a tilted and embedded filter apex. There were no major complications observed. Conclusions The global retrieval rate of IVCF was achieved in 76.9%, and the adjusted retrieval rate was of 94.15% with no major complications. IVCF tilting was associated with failure of filter removal in less than 5% of cases. This study demonstrates that the retrieval procedure of IVCF is controlled by the clinician and not by the interventional radiologist. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|