Control of Aedes aegypti Breeding: A Novel Intervention for Prevention and Control of Dengue in an Endemic Zone of Delhi, India
Autor: | V. N. Bhagat, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, B N Nagpal, Arshad Shamim, Neena Valecha, N R Tuli, Aruna Srivastava, Kumar Vikram, Vandana Singh, N K Yadav, Himmat Singh, Rekha Saxena |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Veterinary medicine
Mosquito Control Epidemiology Social Sciences lcsh:Medicine Pilot Projects Breeding Disease Vectors Mosquitoes Dengue fever law.invention Pooling data Dengue Geographical Locations 0302 clinical medicine Intervention measures Sociology law Aedes Medicine and Health Sciences 030212 general & internal medicine lcsh:Science Multidisciplinary Schools Animal Behavior Habitats Insects Transmission (mechanics) Infectious Diseases Seasons Research Article Asia Arthropoda Infectious Disease Control 030231 tropical medicine India Aedes aegypti Biology Aedes Aegypti Animal Sexual Behavior Education 03 medical and health sciences medicine Animals Humans Behavior Significant difference Ecology and Environmental Sciences lcsh:R Organisms Biology and Life Sciences Baseline data Dengue Virus biology.organism_classification medicine.disease Invertebrates Insect Vectors People and Places lcsh:Q Zoology Entomology |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 12, p e0166768 (2016) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Background and objective The study is based on hypothesis that whether continuous entomological surveillance of Ae. aegypti and simultaneous appropriate interventions in key containers during non-transmission (December–May) months would have any impact on breeding of Aedes and dengue cases during the following transmission months (June–November). The impact of the surveillance and intervention measures undertaken during non-transmission months were assessed by entomological indicators namely container index (CI), house index (HI), pupal index (PI) and breteau index (BI). Methods A total of 28 localities of West Zone of Delhi with persistent dengue endemicity were selected for the study. Out of these localities, 20 were included in study group while other 8 localities were in control group. IEC and various Aedes breeding control activities were carried out in study group in both non-transmission and transmission season whereas control group did not have any such interventions during non-transmission months as per guidelines of MCD. These activities were undertaken by a team of investigators from NIMR and SDMC, Delhi. In control group, investigators from NIMR carried out surveillance activity to monitor the breeding of Aedes mosquito in localities. Results Comparison of baseline data revealed that all indices in control and study group of localities were comparable and statistically non-significant (p>0.05). In both study and control groups, indices were calculated after pooling data on seasonal basis, i.e., transmission and non-transmission months for both years. The test of significance conducted on all the four indices, i.e., HI, PI, CI, and BI, revealed a significant difference (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |