Association between R1 resection and oncological outcome in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors without tumor rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Meng Kong, Leping Li, Yingying Xin, Hongyuan Chen, Hongguang Sheng, Guotao Liu, Hongqing Zhuo |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Surgical margin Stromal cell Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors 030230 surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Rupture GiST business.industry Confounding Margins of Excision Retrospective cohort study General Medicine Prognosis Survival Analysis Tumor rupture Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Surgery Observational study Radiology business |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47:1526-1534 |
ISSN: | 0748-7983 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.032 |
Popis: | Background The influence of positive microscopic margin (R1) resection on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is controversial. Tumor rupture is significantly associated with the occurrence of R1 resection and may be a confounder of R1 resection in GISTs. The present meta-analysis evaluated the real influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GISTs by excluding the confounding effect of tumor rupture. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Studies that compared R1 with negative microscopic margin (R0) resection in GIST patients and reported the time-to-event data of recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results Of the 4896 records screened, 23 retrospective studies with 6248 participants were selected. In the overall analysis, R1 resection resulted in a significantly shorter RFS/DFS than R0 resection for GISTs (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.54–2.10, P Conclusions This meta-analysis shows that R1 resection did not influence the survival outcome of GISTs. Reresection may not be necessary when positive microscopic margins exist. This analysis could provide high-quality evidence for the development of guidelines. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |