Effect of oxygenation modalities among patients with postoperative respiratory failure: a pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
| Autor: | Inderdeep Gakhal, Ghassan Bachuwa, Fatima Rizk, Josiane Kerbage, Shima Sidahmed, Laith Rashdan, Babikir Kheiri, Elfateh Seedahmed, Mahmoud Barbarawi, Saadia Shafi, Esra'a Ismail, Yazan Zayed, Areeg Bala |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_treatment
Cochrane Library Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine medicine.disease_cause law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law medicine Intubation 030212 general & internal medicine business.industry Research lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid Postoperative respiratory failure lcsh:RC86-88.9 Odds ratio Perioperative Intensive care unit Standard oxygen Meta-analysis 030228 respiratory system Respiratory failure Anesthesia High-flow nasal cannula Non-invasive ventilation business Nasal cannula |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Intensive Care Journal of Intensive Care, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2052-0492 |
| Popis: | BackgroundPostoperative respiratory failure is associated with increased perioperative complications. Our aim is to compare outcomes between non-invasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), and standard oxygen in patients at high-risk for or with established postoperative respiratory failure.MethodsElectronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were reviewed from inception to September 2019. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NIV, HFNC, and standard oxygen in patients at high risk for or with established postoperative respiratory failure. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and Bayesian 95% credible intervals (CrIs).ResultsNine RCTs representing 1865 patients were included (the mean age was 61.6 ± 10.2 and 64.4% were males). In comparison with standard oxygen, NIV was associated with a significant reduction in intubation rate (OR 0.23; 95% Cr.I. 0.10–0.46), mortality (OR 0.45; 95% Cr.I. 0.27–0.71), and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections (OR 0.43, 95% Cr.I. 0.25–0.70). Compared to standard oxygen, HFNC was associated with a significant reduction in intubation rate (OR 0.28, 95% Cr.I. 0.08–0.76) and ICU-acquired infections (OR 0.41; 95% Cr.I. 0.20–0.80), but not mortality (OR 0.58; 95% Cr.I. 0.26–1.22). There were no significant differences between HFNC and NIV regarding different outcomes. In a subgroup analysis, we observed a mortality benefit with NIV over standard oxygen in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries but not in abdominal surgeries. Furthermore, in comparison with standard oxygen, NIV and HFNC were associated with lower intubation rates following cardiothoracic surgeries while only NIV reduced the intubation rates following abdominal surgeries.ConclusionsAmong patients with post-operative respiratory failure, HFNC and NIV were associated with significantly reduced rates of intubation and ICU-acquired infections compared with standard oxygen. Moreover, NIV was associated with reduced mortality in comparison with standard oxygen. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink