| Popis: |
To define the relative needs of the staffs of rural, community hospitals for training in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), identify weaknesses, and modify a standard ACLS course to meet these needs.Prospective assessment of knowledge and skills relating to the practice of ACLS.Rural, community hospitals in southern Wisconsin.None.A well-validated, multiple-option, precourse test for life-support knowledge and clinical judgment was administered to the staff nurses, respiratory therapists, and practicing physicians of 12 rural, community hospitals in southern Wisconsin before their participation in a modified, extended, ACLS course, using the pre-1992 American Heart Association standards and guidelines. Testing was accomplished over 4 yrs. Detailed item analysis of the test was performed. A total of 461 persons participated. Overall, physicians performed better (p.001) than did the nurses. Precourse difficulties included electrocardiographic rhythm strip interpretation, particularly with identification of the atrioventricular (A-V) blocks. Only 39.6% of the nurses and 64.1% of the physicians correctly identified third-degree A-V block. One third of the nurses and 22% of the physicians did not correctly identify coarse ventricular fibrillation. The pharmacologic properties and utility of atropine and epinephrine were not understood. Propranolol was selected for treatment of third-degree A-V block by 31.6% and 22.8% of the nurses and the physicians, respectively. Neither group was able to accurately distinguish between the components of disturbances in acid-base balance. The esophageal obturator airway tube was not a familiar tool to any of the groups. No improvement in overall performance on pretests occurred across the calendar years of the study.There is a need for ACLS training in community hospitals. Educational programs for physicians and staffs should be designed to meet that need. |
