Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy

Autor: Pfender, Nikolai, Rosner, Jan, Zipser, Carl Moritz, Friedl, Susanne, Vallotton, Kevin, Sutter, Reto, Klarhoefer, Markus, Schubert, Martin, Betz, Michael, Spirig, José Miguel, Seif, Maryam, Hubli, Michèle, Freund, Patrick, Farshad, Mazda, Curt, Armin, Hupp, Markus
Přispěvatelé: University of Zurich, Hupp, Markus
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Neuroimaging
Pfender, Nikolai; Rosner, Jan; Zipser, Carl Moritz; Friedl, Susanne; Vallotton, Kevin; Sutter, Reto; Klarhoefer, Markus; Schubert, Martin; Betz, Michael; Spirig, José Miguel; Seif, Maryam; Hubli, Michèle; Freund, Patrick; Farshad, Mazda; Curt, Armin; Hupp, Markus (2022). Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Journal of neuroimaging, 32(6), pp. 1121-1133. Wiley 10.1111/jon.13035
Popis: Background and purpose: The timing of decision-making for a surgical intervention in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is challenging. Spinal cord motion phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) measurements can reveal the extent of dynamic mechanical strain on the spinal cord to potentially identify high-risk patients. This study aims to determine the comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements of spinal cord motion with the prospect of improving the clinical workup.Methods: Sixty-four DCM patients underwent a PC-MRI scan assessing spinal cord motion. The agreement of axial and sagittal measurements was determined by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses.Results: The comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements was good to excellent at all cervical levels (ICCs motion amplitude: .810-.940; p < .001). Significant differences between axial and sagittal amplitude values could be found at segments C3 and C4, while its magnitude was low (C3: 0.07 ± 0.19 cm/second; C4: -0.12 ± 0.30 cm/second). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement between axial and sagittal PC-MRI scans (coefficients of repeatability: minimum -0.23 cm/second at C2; maximum -0.58 cm/second at C4). Subgroup analysis regarding anatomic conditions (stenotic vs. nonstenotic segments) and different velocity encoding (2 vs. 3 cm/second) showed comparable results.Conclusions: This study demonstrates good comparability between axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in DCM patients. To this end, axial and sagittal PC-MRI are both accurate and sensitive in detecting pathologic cord motion. Therefore, such measures could identify high-risk patients and improve clinical decision-making (ie, timing of decompression).
Databáze: OpenAIRE