Athletes with primary glenohumeral instability demonstrate lower rates of bone loss than those with recurrent instability and failed prior stabilization
| Autor: | Martin S. Davey, Leo Pauzenberger, David T. Lennon, Eoghan T. Hurley, Hannan Mullett, Mohamed Gaafar |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Joint Instability Male medicine.medical_specialty Glenoid labrum Instability Arthroscopy Young Adult Recurrence medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine In patient Recurrent instability medicine.diagnostic_test biology Shoulder Joint Athletes business.industry Glenohumeral instability Shoulder Dislocation Magnetic resonance imaging General Medicine biology.organism_classification Single surgeon Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Bankart Lesions business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 31:813-818 |
| ISSN: | 1058-2746 |
| Popis: | The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography findings in patients who underwent glenohumeral stabilization with a history of primary instability, recurrent instability, or failed stabilization.All patients who presented with glenohumeral instability and underwent stabilization performed by a single surgeon in our institution between 2008 and 2020 were considered for inclusion in this study. The magnetic resonance arthrography findings of all patients were recorded. Imaging findings were compared between patients with primary instability, those with recurrent instability, and those with failed prior stabilization. P.05 was considered statistically significant.Overall, 871 patients were included, of whom 814 (93.5%) were male patients; the mean age was 23.1 years (range, 13-57 years). There were 200 patients with primary instability, 571 with recurrent instability, and 100 who required revision stabilization surgery, with no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. A significantly higher amount of glenoid bone loss was noted in patients with recurrent instability (43.4%) and failed prior stabilization (56%) than in those with primary instability (26.5%) (P.0001). Additionally, a significantly higher number of Hill-Sachs lesions were observed in patients with recurrent instability (70.1%) and failed prior stabilization (89%) than in those with primary instability (67.5%) (P.0001). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding articular cartilage damage, glenolabral articular disruption, anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments, or superior labral anterior-posterior tears (P.05).Patients presenting for stabilization with recurrent instability or following a failed stabilization procedure have higher rates of glenohumeral bone loss than those with primary instability. Therefore, stabilization of primary instability, particularly in high-functioning athletes with a view to preventing recurrence, may reduce the overall progression of glenohumeral bone loss and potential subsequent inferior clinical outcomes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect