Haplochromis Hilgendorf 1888

Autor:	Vranken, Nathan, Steenberge, Maarten Van, Heylen, Annelies, Decru, Eva, Snoeks, Jos
Rok vydání:	2022
Předmět:	Actinopterygii Animalia Biodiversity Cichlidae Haplochromis Chordata Taxonomy Perciformes
DOI:	10.5281/zenodo.6814831
Popis:	Key to the piscivorous species of Haplochromis from the Lake Edward System This identification key is intended as a practical guide and first step towards the identification of the piscivorous species from the Lake Edward system; in case of doubt, the differential diagnoses in the species’ descriptions should be consulted. When identifying live dominant males, the colour patterns are highly diagnostic and should be checked. A simple dichotomous key cannot be compiled as overlap in character states and in the range of values is omnipresent in species of Haplochromis, especially when they have a similar ecology (Greenwood 1973; Snoeks 1994). However, the key allows for the identification of most specimens. Within the key, terminology is used in reference to species with a piscivorous morphology (instead of the generalised Haplochromis morphology as in the rest of the manuscript). 1. Adult specimens H. pardus sp. nov. – Adult specimens> 100 mm SL; specimens H. latifrons sp. nov. – Body deep [BD 28.4–41.7 (30.8–37.4) % SL]; anal-fin base long [AFB 16.7–21.9 (18.0–19.9) % SL]; interorbital area narrow [IOW 39.3–61.0 (43.9–55.5) % HW]; 8–11 anal fin branched rays... 3 3. Body deep [BD 32.4–39.3 (35.7) % SL]; interorbital area broad [IOW 48.6–55.6 (51.9) % HW]; lower jaw long [LJL 47.8–58.6 (52.7) % HL]; gape steep (30–45°); rows of minute scales on basal part of membranes of both dorsal and anal fins (nearly invisible to naked eye) (Fig. 38); dominant males slate blue (Fig. 39c)........................................................................................ H. squamipinnis – Body deep [BD 33.5–41.7 (37.4) % SL]; interorbital area narrow [IOW 40.5–48.7 (43.9) % HW]; lower jaw short [LJL 44.2–49.6 (47.1) % HL]; gape gentle (20–35°); rows of minute scales on basal part of membrane of anal fin in some specimens, rarely few isolated scales on dorsal fin (nearly invisible to naked eye) (Fig. 35); dominant males light grey dorsally and blue-black ventrally (Fig. 36c).......................................................................................................... H. quasimodo sp. nov. – Body shallow [BD 28.4–36.0 (30.8–33.2) % SL]; interorbital area broad [IOW 39.3–61.0 (44.6– 55.5) % HW]; lower jaw short [LJL 42.4–53.1 (44.7–49.5) % HL]; gape gentle (15–35°); minute scales on dorsal or anal fins absent.................................................................................................... 4 4. Head broad [HW 40.1–43.7 (42.0) % HL]; eye large [ED 30.0–31.5 (30.6) % HL]; 25–37 (median 31) outer upper jaw teeth; dominant males light grey with black head and bright red anal fin (Fig. 21c).................................................................................................................. H. aquila sp. nov. – Head narrow [HW 36.8–42.3 (39.2–40.8) % HL]; eye small [ED 22.2–29.9 (24.6–28.3) % HL]; 22–47 (medians 27–36) outer upper jaw teeth.................................................................................. 5 – Head broad [HW 39.9–48.0 (42.9–45.1) % HL]; eye variable [ED 24.6–31.5 (27.5–30.4) % HL]; 39–70 (medians 45–56) outer upper jaw teeth.................................................................................. 8 5. Pre-dorsal distance short [PrD 33.3–37.0 (35.3–36.1) % SL]; interorbital area broad [IOW 50.9– 61.0 (53.8–55.5) % SL]; 3–4, rarely 5 infraorbital cheek scales; 25–47 (medians 30–36) outer upper jaw teeth............................................................................................................................................. 6 – Pre-dorsal distance long [PrD 36.1–39.2 (37.3–38.0) % SL]; interorbital area narrow [IOW 44.9– 52.7 (48.1–48.9) % SL]; 4–7 infraorbital cheek scales; 22–36 (medians 27–29) outer upper jaw teeth.................................................................................................................................................... 7 6. Pre-pectoral distance short [PrP 33.1–38.2 (36.0) % SL]; caudal peduncle long [CPL 15.7–17.5 (16.6) % SL]; head short [HL 33.4–37.0 (35.1) % SL]; dominant males yellow-green with a bright red anterior part of flank (Fig. 9c)................................................................................... H. mentatus – Pre-pectoral distance long [PrP 36.4–39.4 (38.1) % SL]; caudal peduncle short [CPL 13.4–16.1 (14.8) % SL]; head long [HL 35.9–37.9 (36.9) % SL]; dominant males (and females) light blue with black cheek (Fig. 18c)........................................................................................... H. glaucus sp. nov. 7. Cheek deep [ChD 27.6–33.5 (31.1) % SL]; eye small [ED 22.2–28.3 (24.6) % SL]; 22–27 upper lateral line scales; 12–16 scales between upper lateral line and first anal spine; dominant males cream-coloured with orange operculum and dorsal part of head and light blue snout (Fig. 12c)....................................................................................................................... H. rex sp. nov. – Cheek shallow [ChD 27.0–29.6 (28.3) % SL]; eye large [ED 26.7–29.5 (28.3) % SL]; 19–21 upper lateral line scales; 9–11 scales between upper lateral line and first anal spine; dominant males yellow with an orange anterior part of flank (Fig. 15c)....................................................... H. simba sp. nov. 8. Body pyriform; head convex and broad [HW 42.9–48.0 (45.1) % HL]; cheek deep [ChD 27.1–35.2 (30.9) % HL]; lower jaw broad [LJW 44.7–53.3 (49.3) % LJL]; dominant males grey dorsally and yellow ventrally (Fig. 24c).................................................................................. H. kimondo sp. nov. – Body oval; head straight or slightly convex and narrow [HW 39.9–44.4 (42.6–43.4) % HL]; cheek shallow [ChD 22.4–28.0 (23.2–26.0) % HL]; lower jaw narrow [LJW 38.5–45.5 (40.8–42.5) % LJL]............................................................................................................................................... 9 9. Anal-fin base long [AFB 18.4–20.3 (19.3) % SL]; cheek deep [ChD 23.3–28.0 (26.0) % HL]; dominant males olive-green with an orange-red anterior part of flank and well-defined mid-lateral and dorsal-lateral bands (Fig. 27c)....................................................................... H. falcatus sp. nov. – Anal-fin base short [AFB 17.9–18.6 (18.3) % SL], cheek shallow [ChD 22.4–24.9 (23.2) % HL]; non-dominant males dusky greenish with 5–7 vertical stripes (Fig. 30c)........ H. curvidens sp. nov. Published as part of Vranken, Nathan, Steenberge, Maarten Van, Heylen, Annelies, Decru, Eva & Snoeks, Jos, 2022, From a pair to a dozen: the piscivorous species of Haplochromis (Cichlidae) from the Lake Edward system, pp. 1-94 in European Journal of Taxonomy 815 on pages 73-75, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.815.1749, http://zenodo.org/record/6484153 {"references":["Greenwood P. H. 1973. A revision of the Haplochromis and related species (Pisces: Cichlidae) from Lake George, Uganda. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 25: 139 - 242.","Snoeks J. 1994. The Haplochromine Fishes (Teleostei, Cichlidae) of Lake Kivu, East Africa: a Taxonomic Revision with Notes on their Ecology. Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren."]}
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::686f8ecc313c60240fb128ec4f4bee6f Zobrazit plný text záznamu