Incidence of Peri-Implantitis, Technical and Biological Complications of Single Implants Placed with Flap or Flapless Surgery-A 10-12-Year Case-Series

Autor: Emitis Natali Naeini, Mandana Atashkadeh, Wolfgang Jacquet, Jan D’Haese, Hugo De Bruyn
Přispěvatelé: Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology, Clinical sciences, Localities, Ontologies, Commons, Integrated, Oral Health, Dental Clinic
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Medicine; Volume 12; Issue 11; Pages: 3668
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, 11
ISSN: 2077-0383
Popis: Contains fulltext : 293453.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up of single implants and crowns is scarce, especially when inserted using flapless surgery. AIM: Evaluate survival, peri-implantitis incidence, and technical/biologic complications of solitary implants/crowns after 10-12 years of function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 49 patients with 53 single implants, initially operated with a one-stage flap (F) or flapless (FL) surgery and delayed loading, were recalled. Implant survival, radiographic bone-level changes compared to baseline, peri-implant health, and soft tissue aesthetics were registered. Differences in implant level between and within groups were statistically tested using the Mann-Whitney U-Test and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, respectively. RESULTS: 36 patients with 40 implants were reassessed, yielding 100% implant and 97.5% crown survival. The bone loss in F (n = 19) was 0.56 mm (SD 0.89; range -0.9-2.02) and -0.85 mm (SD 0.98; range -2.84-0.53) in FL (n = 21), indicative of bone gain in FL (p = 0.003), the latter due to a difference at baseline but bone-level was comparable (p = 0.126). Groups were comparable for probing pocket depth (PPD); (3.32 vs. 3.19 mm), Bleeding Index (BI); (0.15 vs. 0.22), and gingival recession; (0.38 vs. 0.17 mm). According to international criteria, the peri-implantitis incidence was 0%, but 32.5% of the implants/crowns experienced biological or technical complications irrespective of surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: Solitary implants and crowns show good long-term clinical outcomes and peri-implant health. Flapless surgery is a good alternative to conventional in straightforward cases with sufficient bone volume and proper treatment planning.
Databáze: OpenAIRE