| Autor: |
Venning, Freja Albjerg, Zornhagen, Kamilla Westarp, Wullkopf, Lena, Sjölund, Jonas, Rodriguez-Cupello, Carmen, Kjellman, Pontus, Morsing, Mikkel, Hajkarim, Morteza Chalabi, Won, Kyoung Jae, Erler, Janine Terra, Madsen, Chris Denis |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| DOI: |
10.6084/m9.figshare.14634072.v1 |
| Popis: |
Additional file 8: Supplementary Table 1. Details of 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test on the Lin- population out of live cells reported in main Fig. 2, all repeats combined. Supplementary Table 2. Details of 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test on the CAF+ population out of Lin- cells reported in main Fig. 2, all repeats combined. Supplementary Table 3. Details of 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test on the CAF+ population out of live cells reported in main Fig. 2, all repeats combined. Supplementary Table 4. Multiple t-tests pertaining to main Fig. 2, all repeats combined. Percentage cells of parent population. Supplementary Table 5. Multiple t-test pertaining to main Fig. 2, all repeats combined. Percentage cells positive for each CAF marker within the CAF+ population. Supplementary Table 6 Tukey’s multiple comparisons from 2-way ANOVA on % of single CAF markers within the CAF+ populations. Data from three independent repeats combined. Significant results reported in main Fig. 2. Supplementary Table 7 Co-expression tables of two CAF markers in 4T1 and 4T07 tumours at different time points, expanding the analysis to contain the time dimension. First CAF marker = parent gate, Subset CAF marker = child gate. CI95 = 95% confidence interval. Supplementary Table 8. Abundance ranking of Boolean CAF subpopulations in 4T1 tumours. Three independent repeats combined, mean % of CAF+ population. Top 5 subpopulations also presented in main Fig. 4. Supplementary Table 9. Abundance ranking of Boolean CAF subpopulations in 4T07 tumours. Three independent repeats combined, mean % of CAF+ population. Top 5 subpopulations also presented in main Fig. 4. Supplementary Table 10. Comparing Boolean CAF subpopulations between tumour types. Percentages from three independent repeats combined. Multiple t-test without assuming equal variance and with FDR correction for multiple comparisons (Q = 1%). Significant results reported in main Table 4. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
