A systematic review shows minimal evidence for measurement properties of psychological functioning outcomes in whiplash

Autor: Carrie Ritchie, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn, Anne Söderlund, Michele Sterling, Linda Carroll, Luke B. Connelly, Pierre Cote, Michele Curatolo, Genevieve Grant, Gwendolen Jull, Helge Kasch, Joy MacDermid, Eva Maj Malmström, Trudy Rebbeck, Julia Treleaven, David Walton, Hans Westergren
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Ritchie, C, Andersen, T E, Ravn, S L, Söderlund, A, Sterling, M & CATWAD 2022, ' A Systematic Review Shows Minimal Evidence for Measurement Properties of Psychological Functioning Outcomes in Whiplash ', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 151, pp. 29-44 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.011
ISSN: 0895-4356
Popis: ObjectivesTo systematically identify, synthesise and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, posttraumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash associated disorders (WAD).Study design and settingPsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (9 November, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines.ResultsMeasurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia – 11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate/high quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS and PFActS-C. Whereas, the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash.ConclusionUntil further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, post-traumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Study Design and Setting: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (November 9, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines. Results: Measurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate- or high-quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS, and PFActS-C, whereas the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash. Conclusion: Until further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS, or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims.
Databáze: OpenAIRE