Proposed attributes of national wildlife health programmes
| Autor: | Marcela Uhart, T. Grillo, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Natalie T. Nguyen, Craig Stephen, Patrick Zimmer, Dolores Gavier-Widén, T. Tana, Hung-Hee Lee, Jolianne M. Rijks, Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis, James Paul Duff |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Sustainable development Scope (project management) Warning system 010604 marine biology & hydrobiology Corporate governance Biosecurity Wildlife General Medicine Wildlife disease 010603 evolutionary biology 01 natural sciences Preparedness Animal Science and Zoology Business Environmental planning |
| Zdroj: | Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE. 37:925-936 |
| ISSN: | 0253-1933 |
| Popis: | Wildlife health is important for conservation, healthy ecosystems, sustainable development and biosecurity. It presents unique challenges for national programme governance and delivery because wildlife health not only crosses jurisdictional responsibilities and authorities but also inherently spans multiple sectors of expertise. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) encourages its Members to have wildlife disease monitoring and notification systems. Where national wildlife health surveillance programmes do exist, they vary in scope and size. Evidence-based guidance is lacking on the critical functions and roles needed to meet the OIE's recommendations and other expectations of a national programme. A literature review and consultation with national wildlife health programme leaders identified five key attributes of national programmes: 1) being knowledge and science based; 2) fostering cross-nation equivalence and harmonisation; 3) developing partnerships and national coordination; 4) providing leadership and administration of national efforts; and 5) capacity development. Proposed core purposes include: 1) establishment and communication of the national wildlife health status; 2) leading national planning; 3) centralising information and expertise; 4) developing national networks leading to harmonisation and collaborations; 5) developing wildlife health workforces; and 6) centralising administration and management of national programmes. A national wildlife health programme should aim to identify, effectively communicate and manage the risk to or from a country's wildlife populations. It should generate the appropriate knowledge required to improve the effectiveness of wildlife policies and systems, including identifying and assessing emerging priorities, thus facilitating early warning, preparedness and preventive actions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|