Comparison of the clinical efficacy of preserved and preservative-free hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-dextran-containing eyedrops

Autor: Pedram Akbarshahi, Parvin Azizzadeh, Masoud Safarzadeh
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
0301 basic medicine
Preservative
medicine.medical_treatment
Artificial tear drops
Administration
Ophthalmic

Cornea
chemistry.chemical_compound
Benzalkonium chloride
Hypromellose Derivatives
0302 clinical medicine
lcsh:Ophthalmology
Surveys and Questionnaires
lcsh:QC350-467
Single-Blind Method
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Clinical efficacy
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
Dextrans
Middle Aged
Drug Combinations
Artificial tears
Treatment Outcome
Dextran
Original Article
Dry Eye Syndromes
Female
Benzalkonium Compounds
lcsh:Optics. Light
medicine.drug
Adult
Lágrimas artificiales
medicine.medical_specialty
Hidroxipropil metilcelulosa
Lubricant Eye Drops
03 medical and health sciences
Ophthalmology
medicine
Humans
Dry eye syndrome
business.industry
Preservatives
Pharmaceutical

Eyelids
Repeated measures design
Síndrome de ojo seco
Dextran 70
030104 developmental biology
chemistry
lcsh:RE1-994
Tears
030221 ophthalmology & optometry
Ophthalmic Solutions
business
Optometry
Zdroj: Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry, Vol 10, Iss 4, Pp 258-264 (2017)
ISSN: 1888-4296
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.002
Popis: Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two sustained-release formulation of artificial tear drops. Patients and methods: This is a randomized patient-masked clinical trial, a total 88 patients into two group A (n = 41; with single dose of artificial tear, containing dextran 70, 1 mg/ml and hypromellose, 3 mg/ml hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and group B (n = 47; with multidose of artificial tear, containing 0.3 g HPMC and 0.1 g of dextran 70, with 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative) were completed the study. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining and Schirmer test, were performed. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the differences among the two products. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean of age of the participants in the Group A and B was 44.08 ± 6.29 (range, 33–58 years) years and 45.83 ± 8.42 (31–60 years), respectively. In comparing two groups before the intervention, the OSDI scores, the TBUT scores, the conjunctival and corneal staining scores and the Schirmer scores did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0.339, p = 0.640, p = 0.334, p = 0.807 and p = 0.676, respectively). After 4 weeks, the OSDI scores, conjunctival and corneal staining scores showed improvement in compare to those before the intervention (p
Databáze: OpenAIRE