On the observation of a transition from fusion to multifragmentation in high multiplicity 16O induced reactions
Autor: | G.G. Jonsson, L. Karlsson, K. Söderström, Bo Jakobsson, Kim Sneppen, F. Schussler, B. Norén, E. Monnand, J.P. Bondorf, H. Nifenecker, V. Kopljar, George Fai |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie (LPSC), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
Rok vydání: | 1990 |
Předmět: |
Physics
influence cognitivo-discursive analysis Nuclear and High Energy Physics Fusion 010308 nuclear & particles physics Charge density social cognition [PHYS.NEXP]Physics [physics]/Nuclear Experiment [nucl-ex] High multiplicity attitude change involvement 01 natural sciences Nuclear physics 0103 physical sciences Multiplicity (chemistry) Atomic physics Nuclear Experiment 010306 general physics media communication |
Zdroj: | Nuclear Physics A Nuclear Physics A, Elsevier, 1990, 509, pp.195-220 |
ISSN: | 0375-9474 |
Popis: | In a pragmatic view of media communication, we present a new method for studying cognitions during reception (labeled ECER method) to go beyond some theoretical and methodological limitations of dual-process theories of attitude formation and change. This implementation of real-time process-tracking operationalizes cognitive elaboration and cues that set processing in motion. It enables picking up viewers' cognitive responses during exposure to the message and analysing them with a cognitivo-discursive analysis (Tropes software). In a first application, the ECER method is integrated into an experiment on the role of the viewer's degree of involvement in cognitive processing. The results show that the more the viewers are involved, the more they engage in cognitive elaboration and the more they develop cognitive strategies of discourse that express a “ real world ”. Inconsistent with current models, we show that involvement does not result in processing one type of cues (peripheral or central) more than another. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |