Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension
| Autor: | Lasserson Tj, Walters Eh, Kanthapillai P |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences
medicine.medical_specialty Sildenafil Hypertension Pulmonary Vasodilator Agents Disease Piperazines Sildenafil Citrate chemistry.chemical_compound 3' 5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases Internal medicine medicine Humans Sulfones Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic business.industry medicine.disease Pulmonary hypertension Crossover study Clinical trial chemistry Purines Relative risk Meta-analysis Physical therapy Etiology business |
| Zdroj: | The Cochrane Library |
| ISSN: | 1469-493X |
| Popis: | Background Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) can be either of unknown aetiology (primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH)) or due to a known underlying cause (secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH). Pulmonary arteriolar vasoconstriction is considered to be an important characteristic of PH. Therapies which aim to vasodilate are used to treat pulmonary hypertension. Objectives To determine the clinical efficacy of sildenafil, a vasodilator which works through inhibition of the enzyme phosphodiesterase type V (PDE5I), administered via any route to people with pulmonary hypertension in primary or secondary forms. Search strategy Electronic databases were searched with pre-defined search terms. Searches were current as of November 2003. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials were considered for inclusion in the review. We included studies which assessed the effects of sildenafil in participants with PPH and SPH. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from clinical trials. Data were entered in RevMan Analyses 1.0.2. Continuous data were pooled with an estimate on either WMD (weighted mean difference) or SMD (standardised mean difference) scales. Dichotomous data were pooled and a RR (relative risk) was calculated. Main results Four studies recruiting 77 participants met the inclusion criteria of the review. Two studies assessed the acute effects of sildenafil. Two small crossover study assessed the effects of long term administration. The 'acute effect' studies indicated that sildenafil has a pulmonary vasodilatory effect. The two crossover studies showed improvement in symptoms. One study showed improvement in fatigue domains from a validated health status questionnaire. Both crossover studies reported that the drug was well tolerated. Reviewers' conclusions The validity of the observed effects is undermined by small participant numbers and inadequate exploration of the different disease etiologies. The effects on long term outcome such as NYHA functional class, symptoms, mortality and exercise capacity require further validation. More studies of adequate size are required before the long term effects of sildenafil on clinically important outcomes can be established. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|