Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark

Autor: Klaus Ejner Andersen, Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen, Sylvia Naiga Tiedemann
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: SAGE Open Medicine, Vol 9 (2021)
SAGE Open Medicine
Svendsen, M T, Tiedemann, S N & Andersen, K E 2021, ' Pros and Cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark ', Sage Open Medicine, vol. 9 . https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211016179
ISSN: 2050-3121
Popis: Objectives: The main objectives of this article are to systematically review the recent literature on patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth and to investigate how the Danish authorities supervise private eHealth clinics with regard to patient safety. Methods: Original studies reporting the association between patient safety and the use of eHealth as a means of communication between patients and healthcare providers were included. Four literature databases were searched for English-language articles reporting results from cohort studies and clinical trials, published from 2015 until March 2021. Moreover, registered private eHealth clinics in Denmark were evaluated with reference to a recent national audit of patient safety issues in eHealth. Results: The literature search retrieved four intervention studies. The studies did not identify any particular patient safety risks associated with the use of eHealth. Many different authorized healthcare providers (preferably, doctors) apply eHealth in various contexts. eHealth is being used as the only form of contact between the healthcare provider and the patient, as a supplement to patient visitations in an outpatient clinic, or as a tool for communicating between two or more healthcare providers. The regulation of eHealth involves patient safety issues but also has interfaces to marketing, IT systems, and infrastructure. Supervision of eHealth includes the organization of clinics, handling patient charts, prescription medicine, patient legal rights, and patient transition. However, there are many interfaces in the division of responsibilities among the various governmental players. Conclusion: eHealth is being used increasingly and in many settings, although recently published intervention studies investigating patient safety issues by the use of eHealth are limited. A structured and continuous governmental control and regulation of patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth is warranted.
Databáze: OpenAIRE