Publication landscape of the Russian science

Autor: Parfenova SL, Zolotarev DV, Grishakina EG, Bogatov VV
Jazyk: ruština
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Science. Innovation. Education 12(1) 53-79
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3778368
Popis: This article is dedicated to the problems of the existing research approaches and quantitative methods of evaluation of the publication landscape of the Russian science. The aim of the research is to develop universal tools for the publication land- scape of the Russian science analysis that enable diferent scientometric experiments. The subject of the research are the methods of analysis of the publication landscape of the Russian science. The main tasks of the research are 1) to develop algorithms for article fractional counting and 2) to demonstrate their application in practice. Web of Science Core Collection provides the information and analytical base of the research. This database is characterized by high requirements for the quality of scientiic journals, which publish the most valuable information on research results in all ields of science. In the course of the study the authors have determined two methodological approaches to the calculation of the number of scientiic publica- tions and have worked out four algorithms of fractional counting, which enable dif- ferent options of bibliographic data analysis depending on the aim and objectives of Russia’s publication landscape construction. The irst methodological approach is based on measuring the number of ailiations and may be applied at each level of the hierarchical system. The second approach is based on identiication of organiza- tions or organizations’ groups and may be used to count the number of articles at the relevant levels. The research outcome is illustrated by application of the developed algorithms to the solution of the most typical tasks, which may arise in connection with mapping the publication landscape of the Russian science.
{"references":["PRICE, D. (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes // J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Vol. 27. P. 292–305.","KAPITSA, P. L. (1989). Letters about science. 1930–1980. Moscow. Moskovskiy rabochiy.","NALIMOV, V. V. (1969) Scientometrics. Moscow. Nauka.","ALLAKHVERDYAN, A. G. et al. (1998). Psychology of science. Textbook. Moscow. Moscow psycho-social institution: Flinta.","SOKOLOV, I. A. (2015) Strategy in practice. What changes our science needs. Poisk. No. 42. Available from: http://www.poisknews. ru/theme/science-politic/16120/ [Accessed: 14th January 2017].","AKOEV, M. A. (ed.) (2014) Science, Technology, and Society. Guide to scientometrics: development indicators of science and technology. Ekaterinburg. Ural University Publishing.","PRICE, D. DE S., BEAVER D. B. (1966) Collaboration in an invisible college // American Psychologist. 21 (11). P. 1011–1018.","ANDERSON, Cf. J., COLLINS, P., IRVINE, J., ISARD, P. A., MARTIN, B. R., NARIN, F., STEVENS, K. (1988) On-line approaches to measuring national scientiic output: A cautionary tale // Science and Public Policy. No. 15. P. 153–161.","MARTIN, B. R., IRVINE, J., NARIN, F., STERRIT, C., STEVENS, K. A. (1990) Recent trends in output and impact of British science // Science and Public Policy. No. 17. P. 14–26.","NEDERHOF, A. J., MOED, H. F. (1993) Modeling multinational publication: development of an on-line fractionation approach to measure national scientiic output // Scientometrics. 27 (1). P. 39–52.","DE LANGE, C., GLANZEL, W. (1997) Modelling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientiic collaboration. Part I. Development of a new model using a series expansion approach // Scientometrics. 49 (3). P. 593–604.","EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R., VAN HOOYDONK, G. (2000) Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies // Journal of the American society for information science. 51 (2). P. 145–157.","LEYDESDORFF, L. (1988) Problems with the 'measurement' of national scientiic performance // Science and Public Policy. No. 15. P. 149–152.","SCHUBERT, A., GLANZEL, W., BRAUN, T. (1989) Scientometric datailes. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major ields and subields 1981–1985 // Scientometrics. No. 16. P. 3–478.","AJIFERUKE, I., BURELL, Q., TAGUE, J. (1988) Collaborative coeicient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research // Scientometrics. No. 14. P. 421–433.","HUANG, M.-H., LIN, C.-S., CHEN, D-Z. (2011) Counting Methods, Country Rank Changes, and Counting Inlation in the Assessment of National Research Productivity and Impact // Journal of the American society for information science and technology. 62 (12). P. 2427–2436.","IGNATYEV, A. A., YABLONSKY, A. I. (1975) Analytic structures of communication in science. Systems Research Yearbook. P. 64–81.","HAITUN, S. D. (1983) Scientometrics. State and Perspectives. Moscow. Nauka.","BOGOROV, V. G. (2015) Development of international and regional citation indexes powered by the Web of Science platform. Raising the quantity and quality of scientiic output of Russian authors Workshop proceedings. Available from: http://elar.urfu. ru/bitstream/10995/33896/1/seminar_06.10.15_Bogorov.pdf [Accessed: 23rd May 2016].","ZOLOTAREV, D. V. (2016) The analysis of some aspects of fractional counting of scientiic articles. Science. Innovations. Education. 19 (1). P. 105–114.","PARFENOVA, S. L. (2015) Researchers publications in public administration based on web of science information-analytical services. Proceedings of the 4th International Research-to-Practice Conference \"Scientiic Publication of the International Level – 2015: Modern Trends in World Practice, Editing, Publication and Evaluation of Scientiic Publications\". Ed. by Kirillova O. V. Saint Petersburg. The North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Federation Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. P. 109–116."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: