Prevention of genital prolapse following Burch colposuspension: comparison between two surgical procedures
| Autor: | Mordechai Pansky, Rami Langer, Ian Bukovsky, Y. Lipshitz, D. Sherman, R. Halperin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2003 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors Pelvic floor business.industry Urinary Incontinence Stress Urology Follow up studies Obstetrics and Gynecology Urinary incontinence Burch colposuspension Surgical procedures Surgery Douglas' Pouch Postoperative Complications medicine.anatomical_structure Uterine Prolapse Concomitant Humans Medicine Female Sex organ medicine.symptom Detection rate business Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 14:13-16 |
| ISSN: | 1433-3023 0937-3462 |
| Popis: | Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of cul-de-sac obliteration in preventing pelvic floor anatomical defects formation following Burch colposuspension. We evaluated 441 patients who had undergone Burch colposuspension. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (132 patients) who underwent Burch colposuspension only, and group B (309 patients) who had had a concomitant cul-de-sac obliteration. Cul-de-sac obliteration was performed using two different techniques, the Moschocowitz procedure in 131 patients, and approximation of the sacrouterine ligaments in 178 patients. The follow-up period was 8.6 years (range 3–16). In total we found 43/441 (9.7%) postoperative anatomical defects. Obliteration of the cul de sac significantly (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink