Run‐in periods and clinical outcomes of antipsychotics in dementia: A meta‐epidemiological study of placebo‐controlled trials

Autor: Hendrika J Luijendijk, Tessa A. Hulshof, Christine C. Gispen-de Wied, Sytse U Zuidema
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
ISSN: 1099-1557
1053-8569
Popis: Purpose Run‐in periods are used to identify placebo‐responders and washout. Our aim was to assess the association of run‐in periods with clinical outcomes of antipsychotics in dementia. Methods We searched randomized placebo‐controlled trials of conventional and atypical antipsychotics for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia in electronic sources and references of selected articles. We extracted (a) the presence of a run‐in period, use of placebo/investigated drug during run‐in (versus washout only), and run‐in duration (1 week or more) and (b) the reduction in NPS, number of participants with somnolence, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and deaths per treatment group. We pooled clinical outcomes comparing antipsychotic and placebo groups in trials with and without run‐in. Results We identified 35 trials. Twenty‐nine trials used run‐in. The pooled standardized mean difference in the reduction of NPS was −0.170 (95% CI, −0.227 to −0.112) in trials with run‐in and −0.142 (95% CI, −0.331 to 0.047) in trials without run‐in. The pooled odds ratio for somnolence was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.3‐3.5) in trials with run‐in and 3.5 (95% CI, 1.2‐10.7) in trials without run‐in; for EPS, these ORs were 1.8 (95% CI, 1.4‐2.2) and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3‐3.1) respectively, and for mortality 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0‐2.0) and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.7‐3.4). The use of placebo/investigated drug during run‐in and run‐in duration did not affect the estimates in a consistent way. Conclusions The use of run‐in in trials might have led to overestimated efficacy and especially underestimated risks of side effects of antipsychotics compared with placebo for NPS in dementia.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: