Evaluation of the impact of a public bicycle share program on population bicycling in Vancouver, BC
Autor: | Kay Teschke, Lise Gauvin, Scott A. Lear, Daniel Fuller, Michael Brauer, Meghan Winters, Kate Hosford |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Built environment
Bicycle share media_common.quotation_subject Population lcsh:Medicine Poison control Health Informatics Suicide prevention Occupational safety and health 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 11. Sustainability Injury prevention 030212 general & internal medicine Socioeconomics education Evaluation media_common education.field_of_study 030505 public health lcsh:R Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Regular Article Active travel Difference in differences Bicycling Geography Service (economics) 0305 other medical science |
Zdroj: | Preventive Medicine Reports Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol 12, Iss, Pp 176-181 (2018) |
ISSN: | 2211-3355 |
Popis: | Public bicycle share programs have been implemented in cities around the world to encourage bicycling. However, there are limited evaluations of the impact of these programs on bicycling at the population level. This study examined the impact of a public bicycle share program on bicycling amongst residents of Vancouver, BC. Using an online panel, we surveyed a population-based sample of Vancouver residents three times: prior to the implementation of the public bicycle share program (T0, October 2015, n = 1111); in the early phase of implementation (T1, October 2016, n = 995); and one-year post implementation (T2, October 2017, n = 966). We used difference in differences estimation to assess whether there was an increase in bicycling amongst those living and/or working in close proximity (≤500 m) to Vancouver's Mobi by Shaw Go public bicycle share program, compared to those living and working outside this area. Results suggest that only living or only working inside the bicycle share service area was not associated with increases in bicycling at T1 or T2 relative to those outside the service area. Both living and working inside the bicycle share service area was associated with increases in bicycling at T1 (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.07, 4.80), however not at T2 (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.67, 2.83). These findings indicate that the implementation of a public bicycle share program may have a greater effect on bicycling for residents who both live and work within the service area, although this effect may not be sustained over time. Keywords: Bicycling, Bicycle share, Built environment, Active travel, Evaluation |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |