The Context-Variable Self and Autonomy: Exploring Surveillance Experience, (Mis)recognition, and Action at Airport Security Checkpoints
| Autor: | Stephen Reicher, Meghan E. McNamara |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | University of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Scrutiny
Airport security Airports BF Psychology media_common.quotation_subject lcsh:BF1-990 Imposed categories NDAS Psychology of self BF Identity (social science) airports 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Recognition/misrecognition Volition (linguistics) Psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences autonomy recognition/misrecognition Autonomy General Psychology Original Research media_common frame of reference Surveillance Identity claims social identity 05 social sciences Social identity identity claims Selfhood lcsh:Psychology Action (philosophy) selfhood surveillance Security Frame of reference Construct (philosophy) Social psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 10 (2019) Frontiers in Psychology |
| ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02258 |
| Popis: | This paper critiques and extends the notion of autonomy by examining how common autonomy definitions construct selfhood, with the support of an analysis of airport surveillance experiences. In psychology, autonomy is 1) often oriented around volition and action rather than the-self-that-acts and 2) the-self-that-acts is construed in singular terms. This neglects the multiple, context-variable self: while others may confirm our self-definitions (recognition), identity claims may also be rejected (misrecognition). The autonomy critique is sustained through an ethnographic analysis of airport security accounts (N = 156) in multiple nations with comparable security procedure (e.g., identification checks, luggage screening, questioning). Such procedures position people in multiple ways (e.g. as safe/dangerous, human/object, respectable/trash). Where respondents felt recognized, they experienced the security procedures positively, actively assisted in the screening process (engaged participation), and did not adapt their behaviors. Where respondents felt misrecognized, they experienced surveillance negatively, were alienated, and responded by either accommodating their behavior to avoid scrutiny, seeking to disrupt the process, or else withdrawing from screening sites. In misrecognition, the strategies that are open to the subject are incompatible with autonomy, if autonomy is defined solely in terms of volition. Accordingly, the concept of autonomy needs to be analyzed on two levels: in terms of the subject’s ability freely to determine their own sense of self, as well as the actor’s ability freely to enact selfhood. Publisher PDF |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|