Is the ICU staff satisfied with the computerized physician order entry? A cross-sectional survey study
| Autor: | Renata Rego Lins Fumis, Guilherme Schettino, Eduardo L. V. Costa, Vladimir Ribeiro Pizzo, Ivens Souza, Paulo Sergio Martins |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Attitude of Health Personnel Cross-sectional study Health Personnel Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Medical Order Entry Systems law.invention Patient safety Nursing Computerized physician order entry law Surveys and Questionnaires Health care Physician practice patterns medicine Humans Grading (education) Medical order entry system Attitude to Computers business.industry Health care surveys Workload Original Articles General Medicine Intensive care unit Clinical pharmacy Intensive Care Units Cross-Sectional Studies Job satisfaction Family medicine Female business |
| Zdroj: | Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva |
| ISSN: | 0103-507X |
| DOI: | 10.5935/0103-507x.20140001 |
| Popis: | Objective: To evaluate the satisfaction of the intensive care unit staff with a computerized physician order entry and to compare the concept of the computerized physician order entry relevance among intensive care unit healthcare workers. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey to assess the satisfaction of the intensive care unit staff with the computerized physician order entry in a 30-bed medical/surgical adult intensive care unit using a self-administered questionnaire. The questions used for grading satisfaction levels were answered according to a numerical scale that ranged from 1 point (low satisfaction) to 10 points (high satisfaction). Results: The majority of the respondents (n=250) were female (66%) between the ages of 30 and 35 years of age (69%). The overall satisfaction with the computerized physician order entry scored 5.74±2.14 points. The satisfaction was lower among physicians (n=42) than among nurses, nurse technicians, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists and diet specialists (4.62±1.79 versus 5.97±2.14, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|