Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for pediatric patients with asthma in the emergency department
| Autor: | Thomas Ludden, Diane M Derkowski, Kelly Reeves, Hazel Tapp, Lindsay Shade, Melinda Manning, Stacy Reynolds, Christopher M. Shea, Katherine O’Hare, Melissa Calvert, Elizabeth C. Burton, Melanie M. Hogg, Andrew McWilliams |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychological intervention Information technology Health administration Study Protocol 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Nursing 030225 pediatrics Acute care Health care medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Innovation Shared decision making Health policy lcsh:R5-920 Pediatric asthma business.industry Health services research Focus group Implementation Implementation research lcsh:Medicine (General) business Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Implementation Science Communications, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) Implementation Science Communications |
| ISSN: | 2662-2211 |
| Popis: | Background Asthma is a difficult-to-manage chronic disease marked with associated outcome disparities including an increase rate of emergency department (ED) visits for uncontrolled asthma among patients who are most at-risk. Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which the patient and provider jointly make a healthcare choice. SDM improves patient outcomes; however, implementation barriers of time constraints and staff availability are limitations. The use of health IT solutions may increase the adoption of SDM, but best practices for implementation are not well understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a flexible comprehensive model used to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation. The goal of this study is to implement an innovative web-based pediatric SDM tool in the real-world setting of two large healthcare system EDs through the following aims: (1) convene a patient, research, and ED stakeholder advisory board to oversee review of protocol and study materials prior to implementation, (2) implement the SDM intervention where providers and staff will be trained to incorporate use of this SDM intervention, (3) conduct on-going evaluation of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes to tailor implementation in the EDs, (4) evaluate patient-centered outcomes of primary care utilization and changes in ED visits and hospitalizations before and after the SDM intervention, and (5) understand and document best practices for ED implementation. Methods The CFIR model will guide the implementation evaluation. Researchers will administer surveys to the clinical team and patients at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to inform implementation design, determine barriers and facilitators, and resource-needs to allow for real-time process adjustments within the EDs. Focus group or key-informant interviews and analysis will provide additional feedback to the stakeholder team to iterate the implementation process. Researchers will track patient-centered outcomes including increased primary care, ED, and inpatient utilization over the duration of the study. Discussion To advance asthma care and the field of implementation science, further research is needed to assess best practices for incorporating SDM into high-need healthcare settings such as the ED. This knowledge will facilitate improved outcomes and appropriate policy changes towards further use of SDM interventions in local and national acute care settings. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|