Prediction and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism
Autor: | Jean M. Connors, Alok A. Khorana, Rachel P. Rosovsky, Maria T. DeSancho, Howard A. Liebman, Jeffrey I. Zwicker |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty Hemorrhage Context (language use) 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Individual risk law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Risk Factors law Neoplasms medicine Humans In patient Intensive care medicine business.industry Anticoagulants Cancer Venous Thromboembolism Guideline medicine.disease Special Series: Approach to the Patient with Cancer and Thrombosis Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis business Risk assessment Venous thromboembolism |
Zdroj: | Oncologist |
ISSN: | 1549-490X 1083-7159 |
DOI: | 10.1002/onco.13569 |
Popis: | Venous and arterial thromboembolism are prevalent, highly burdensome, and associated with risk of worse outcomes for patients with cancer. Risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies widely across specific cancer subpopulations. The ability to predict risk of cancer-associated VTE is critical because an optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy is best achieved by targeting high-risk patients with cancer and avoiding prophylaxis in patients with cancer at low risk for VTE. A validated risk tool for solid tumors has been available for a decade. Newer tools have focused on specific populations, such as patients with multiple myeloma. Emerging studies continue to optimize risk prediction approaches in patients with cancer. Recent randomized trials have specifically addressed risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis using direct oral anticoagulants, and revised guidelines have included these new data to formulate recommendations for outpatient thromboprophylaxis. Implementation science approaches to enhance use of outpatient prophylaxis in the context of these guideline changes are under way. However, major knowledge gaps remain, including a lack of data for inpatient thromboprophylaxis in the cancer setting and a lack of formal tools for identifying risk of bleeding. This review describes optimal approaches to risk prediction and patient selection for primary pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE, addresses barriers to implementing these practices, and highlights strategies to overcome them. Implications for Practice Risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies widely among patients with cancer. Individual risk can be determined using validated approaches. Inpatient and postsurgical thromboprophylaxis is more widely accepted. However, most patients with cancer develop VTE in the outpatient setting. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated benefit to risk-adapted outpatient thromboprophylaxis. High-risk patients may therefore be considered for outpatient thromboprophylaxis as recommended by recently updated guidelines. System-wide implementation approaches are necessary to improve compliance with prophylaxis. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |