Brazilian guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of primary cutaneous melanoma - Part II*

Autor: Renato Marchiori Bakos, Sérgio Schrader Serpa, Thais Helena Bello Di Giacomo, Hamilton Ometto Stolf, Walter Refkalefsky Loureiro, João Pedreira Duprat Neto, Luiz Guilherme Martins Castro, Flávia Vasques Bittencourt, Gabriel Gontijo, Maria Cristina de Lorenzo Messina, Ricardo Silvestre e Silva Macarenco
Přispěvatelé: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz-São Paulo, Oncoderma-São Paulo, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA), Hospital Ipiranga, Universidade Estadual do Pará (UEPA), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Zdroj: Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, Volume: 91, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-58, Published: FEB 2016
Scopus
Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, Vol 91, Iss 1, Pp 49-58 (2016)
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.91 n.1 2016
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)
instacron:SBD
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
ISSN: 1806-4841
0365-0596
Popis: Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:27:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2016-01-01. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2021-07-15T15:03:57Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 S0365-05962016000100049.pdf: 319668 bytes, checksum: 5210661e92fd56dd2bdededc908c4a4f (MD5) The last Brazilian guidelines on melanoma were published in 2002. Development in diagnosis and treatment made updating necessary. The coordinators elaborated ten clinical questions, based on PICO system. A Medline search, according to specific MeSH terms for each of the 10 questions was performed and articles selected were classified from A to D according to level of scientific evidence. Based on the results, recommendations were defined and classified according to scientific strength. The present Guidelines were divided in two parts for editorial and publication reasons. In this second part, the following clinical questions were answered: 1) which patients with primary cutaneous melanoma benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy? 2) Follow-up with body mapping is indicated for which patients? 3) Is preventive excision of acral nevi beneficious to patients? 4) Is preventive excision of giant congenital nevi beneficious to patients? 5) How should stages 0 and I primary cutaneous melanoma patients be followed?. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz-São Paulo Oncoderma-São Paulo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Departamento de Câncer de Pele A. C. Camargo Cancer Center Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA) Hospital Ipiranga Universidade Estadual do Pará (UEPA) Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”(UNESP) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”(UNESP)
Databáze: OpenAIRE