Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Autor: Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez, Marco A. Alvarez-Gonzalez, María Pellisé, David Coto-Ugarte, Hugo Uchima, Javier Aranda-Hernández, José Santiago García, José Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Fausto Riu Pons, Oscar Nogales, Ramiro Carreño Macian, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Luis Hernández, G. Oliver Patrón, Manuel Rodriguez-Tellez, Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo, Mónica Sánchez Alonso, Maria Daca, Eduardo Valdivielso-Cortazar, Alberto Álvarez Delgado, Mónica Enguita, Sheyla Montori, Eduardo Albéniz
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 97:941-951.e2
ISSN: 0016-5107
Popis: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) to treat large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCL). In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR versus CEMR on LNPCL.We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial from February 2018 to February 2020 in 11 hospitals in Spain. A total of 298 patients (311 lesions) were randomized to the UEMR (n=149) and CEMR (n=162) groups. The main outcome was the lesion recurrence rate in at least one follow-up colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included technical aspects, en bloc resection rate, R0 and adverse events, among others.There were no differences in the overall recurrence rate [9.5% UEMR vs. 11.7% CEMR; absolute risk difference -2.2% (CI 95%: -9.4% to 4.9%)]. However, considering the polyp sizes between 20 and 30 mm, the recurrence rate was lower for UEMR [3.4% UEMR vs. 13.1% CEMR; absolute risk difference -9.7% (CI 95%: -19.4% to 0%)]. The R0 resection showed the same tendency, with significant differences favoring UEMR only for polyps between 20 and 30 mm. Overall, UEMR was faster and easier to perform than CEMR. Importantly, both techniques were equally safe.UEMR is a valid alternative to CEMR of LNPCL and could be considered the first option of treatment for lesions between 20-30 mm due to its higher en bloc and R0 resection rates.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: