Collaboration or negotiation: two ways of interacting suggest how shared thinking develops
| Autor: | Rebeca Mejía-Arauz, Barbara Rogoff, Richard Henne-Ochoa, Andrew Dayton |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Motivation Negotiating media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 050301 education Model fitting United States Epistemology Negotiation Cultural diversity Mexican Americans Humans Join (sigma algebra) Attention 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Cooperative Behavior Child Social Behavior Psychology 0503 education General Psychology 050104 developmental & child psychology Unified Process media_common |
| Zdroj: | Current Opinion in Psychology. 23:117-123 |
| ISSN: | 2352-250X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.017 |
| Popis: | This paper contrasts two ways that shared thinking can be conceptualized: as negotiation, where individuals join their separate ideas, or collaboration, as people mutually engage together in a unified process, as an ensemble. We argue that these paradigms are culturally based, with the negotiation model fitting within an assumption system of separate entities — an assumption system we believe to be common in psychology and in middle-class European American society — and the collaboration model fitting within a holistic worldview that appears to be common in Indigenous-heritage communities of the Americas. We discuss cultural differences in children's interactions — as negotiation or collaboration — that suggest how these distinct paradigms develop. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect