Comparison of Incremental Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Adaptation Training Versus x1 Training in Patients With Chronic Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: A Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
| Autor: | Phillip D. Cremer, Christopher J. Todd, William V. C. Figtree, Carlo N Rinaudo, Americo A. Migliaccio, Michael C. Schubert |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Visual acuity
Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Dizziness law.invention Randomized controlled trial law Vertigo Medicine Humans Gait Balance (ability) biology business.industry Rehabilitation Repeated measures design Reflex Vestibulo-Ocular biology.organism_classification Adaptation Physiological Anesthesia Reflex sense organs Neurology (clinical) Vestibulo–ocular reflex medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT. 45(4) |
| ISSN: | 1557-0584 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A crossover, double-blinded randomized controlled trial to investigate once-daily incremental vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation (IVA) training over 2 years in people with stable and chronic peripheral vestibular hypofunction. METHODS Twenty-one patients with peripheral vestibular hypofunction were randomly assigned to intervention-then-control (n = 12) or control-then-intervention (n = 9) groups. The task consisted of either x1 (control) or IVA training, once daily every day for 15 minutes over 6-months, followed by a 6-month washout, then repeated for arm 2 of the crossover. Primary outcome: vestibulo-ocular reflex gain. Secondary outcomes: compensatory saccades, dynamic visual acuity, static balance, gait, and subjective symptoms. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Between-group differences were analyzed using a linear mixed model with repeated measures. RESULTS On average patients trained once daily 4 days per week. IVA training resulted in significantly larger VOR gain increase (active: 20.6% ± 12.08%, P = 0.006; passive: 30.6% ± 25.45%, P = 0.016) compared with x1 training (active: -2.4% ± 12.88%, P = 0.99; passive: -0.6% ± 15.31%, P = 0.68) (P < 0.001). The increased IVA gain did not significantly reduce with approximately 27% persisting over the washout period. x1 training resulted in greater reduction of compensatory saccade latency (P = 0.04) and increase in amplitude (P = 0.02) compared with IVA training. There was no difference between groups in gait and balance measures; however, only the IVA group had improved total Dizziness Handicap Inventory (P = 0.006). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest IVA improves VOR gain and reduces perception of disability more than conventional x1 training. We suggest at least 4 weeks of once-daily 4 days-per-week IVA training should be part of a comprehensive vestibular rehabilitation program.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A356). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|